Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION <br />January 18, 2018 <br />playground area, if a splash pad was put in. Kost stated some rubberized <br />surface would be needed to meet ADA requirements. It was mentioned <br />that all of these ideas would be expensive. Councilman Fischer suggested <br />the Commission consider what elements would better the park, and <br />consider the cost as the actual process began to play out. He explained <br />items could always be scaled back, but this plan should illustrate the best <br />vision for the park. Darling stated the splash pad could be put in a <br />different park. Councilman Fisher noted parking would be an issue in <br />other parks. It was suggested the splash pad be put in Spooner Park. The <br />Parks Maintenance Supervisor explained there are a significant number of <br />trees in Spooner Park and falling leaves would add additional <br />maintenance. Kost noted the two concept themes were not mutually <br />exclusive and elements could be combined or changed. Councilman <br />Fischer noted he was happy to have the two contrasting themes which <br />allowed the Commission to visualize their ideas. Schletty asked if this plan <br />should include a water fountain near the basketball courts as discussed in <br />previous Commission meetings. The Community Services Manager stated <br />that location was difficult because water lines would have to be connected <br />from the street. He explained walking to the central pavilion was more <br />economical than building a water fountain. The Parks Maintenance <br />Supervisor noted the concepts include a lot of new park shelters which <br />would require a lot more parking. He suggested more open space would be <br />a better option. Schletty wondered if these concepts over programmed the <br />park. He suggested more space be left open. Kost noted the City wouldn’t <br />likely be able to build additional parks, because it is developed. He asked <br />the Commission to consider what amenities would be important, because <br />there may not be other spaces to incorporate them. <br /> <br />Kost asked the Commission which theme they liked better and what <br />features they liked best. He explained Springer and himself could create a <br />hybrid plan to showcase at the open house. Abruzzese stated she was in <br />favor of the Into the Wild theme because it incorporates the needs of the <br />community, but it doesn’t have a splash pad. She explained she would like <br />to see a splash pad in the final plan. Abruzzese stated the natural elements <br />would be intriguing for park goers. Darling stated she preferred the Into <br />the Wild Theme, and the community garden and splash pad features. She <br />suggested the exercise stations be incorporated into a different park and <br />the ice rink be skipped. Schletty stated he preferred the Into the Wild <br />theme as well. He noted the character of the community doesn’t align with <br />the sharp angles of the New France theme. Schletty explained he did like <br />all of the extra elements of the New France theme including the additional <br />multipurpose field, exercise stations and dog park. Kost stated the park <br />should be looked at in terms of layers. He explained kids want to go to a <br />park to play on the playground, but other age groups should also be <br />considered. Chair Miller stated he like the Into the Wild theme because the <br />trail wasn’t being moved as much. He also liked Into the Wild because the