Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JANUARY 24, 2018 <br />PUBLIC HEARING Keis opened the public hearing. <br />— PUD PERMIT <br />AMENDMENT <br />The Associate Planner stated that Mr. Meyer, owner of Pete's Water & <br />FOR OUTDOOR <br />Sewer, has submitted a revised site plan and staff has met with him and his <br />STORAGE & <br />representative twice since this case was tabled at the December Planning <br />ALLOW <br />Commission meeting. She explained that they have revised their site plan <br />OUTDOOR <br />#12, by reducing the amount of outdoor storage, and are no longer seeking <br />STORAGE IN THE <br />the encroachment into the required front yard setback. She explained that <br />FRONT YARD <br />due to the lack of rear yard, staff does feel that there is a reason to vary <br />AREA AND <br />from some of the requirements, and that variation is consistent with how <br />CONDITIONAL <br />staff has handled 209 and 221 Ryan Drive with the exception of storage <br />USE PERMIT FOR <br />directly in front of the buildings. She stated that site plan # 12 shows <br />A SPECIAL <br />outdoor storage in front of both buildings. <br />PURPOSE FENCE <br />AT 3151 COUNTRY The Associate Planner indicated that Mr. Meyer will be remodeling the <br />DRIVE; <br />interior of the west building from a multi -tenant into a single tenant space <br />APPLICANT: <br />for 7-10 employees, and will be eliminating the multiple entrances. She <br />MEYER <br />stated that the west building is considered the principal building for this <br />COMPANIES <br />site and staff believes the visibility and appearance of that should be <br />maintained. She noted that in similar variances for nearby properties, <br />approval was granted for outdoor storage to encroach past the front line of <br />the building, but it was not allowed in front of the principal building. She <br />stated that Mr. Meyer is seeking to be allowed outdoor storage in front of <br />the building because he feels he is maintaining the visibility of having a <br />prominent entrance to the building. She explained that based on being <br />consistent with how the other two similar variance requests on Ryan Drive <br />were handled, staff would recommend that no outdoor storage be located <br />in front of the principal (west) building. She stated staff believes that <br />outdoor storage in front of the east building is reasonable since this is an <br />accessory building. <br />The Associate Planner reported that in addition to reconfiguring the layout <br />of the site, Mr. Meyer has also changed how the outdoor storage areas will <br />be screened. She explained that a survey confirmed that the existing chain <br />link fence on the south side of the property is located within the City's <br />right-of-way. As a result, Mr. Meyer is now proposing to replace all of <br />the existing fencing with a new, solid, six-foot high wood fence in the <br />front yard and eight -foot high in the side and rear yard. The Associate <br />Planner explained that the proposed fence heights do comply with city <br />ordinances, however the City Code would only allow either a chain link or <br />woven wire fence in the front yard (along Ryan Drive) to allow visibility. <br />She noted that the Code does have a provision to allow for a Special <br />Purpose Fence by Conditional Use Permit if it is determined that <br />construction, height or length, should differ from this requirement. With <br />that, the applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to <br />0a <br />