Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JANUARY 24, 2018 <br />McGraw asked what he would be seeing when he drives by the property. <br />Mr. Meyer stated that they are proposing a composite cedar -look fence <br />around the perimeter so there will be very little storage seen above the <br />fence. The Associate Planner noted that the zoning code limits outdoor <br />storage height to eight feet, but does allow equipment heights to exceed <br />that if they are kept in their most compact form. Fischer asked the <br />applicant to comment about staff's recommendation to not allow the <br />outdoor storage in front of the building. Mr. Meyer stated that they made <br />several changes to their site plans to compromise with the City's rules, but <br />that could be a deal breaker since they really need that additional outdoor <br />storage space. <br />Jennifer Cook, realtor representing the applicant, stated that this process <br />with the City was started in November and things got delayed. She <br />explained that Mr. Meyer needed to move out of his previous location and <br />due to the delay getting to the Planning Commission, he had to go <br />somewhere. <br />Fischer clarified with the applicant that the outdoor storage in front of the <br />west building is necessary. Mr. Meyer stated that having it would allow <br />them to be in a better position to stay in compliance with the outdoor <br />storage parameters. Fischer stated that he would support allowing the <br />storage in front of the building if it would make the site stay in compliance <br />and be able to be kept orderly. <br />Upon motion by Keis, seconded by Fischer, the public hearing was closed. <br />Montour introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOL UTION NO. 2018-1-16—APPR0 VE THE PLANNED UNIT <br />DEVELOPMENTAMENDMENTAT 3151 COUNTRYDRIVE TO <br />ALLOW OUTDOOR STORAGEAS PERMITTED IN CHAPTER <br />914.040 AND THE PAVING OF THE SITE AS SHOWN ON THE <br />SITE PLAN PRESENTED, BASED ON THE FACT THAT THE <br />PROPERTY HAS DIFFICUL TY MEETING CITY CODE DUE TO NO <br />REAR YARD; OWNER MUST INSTALL A COMPOSITE FENCE AS <br />PRESENTED; AND ALL ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS OF <br />THE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Keis. <br />Ayes (4). <br />Nays (1). Fischer. Resolution adopted. <br />M <br />