Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> STAFF REPORT <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />TO: Mayor Keis and Members of the City Council <br /> <br />FROM: Joel Hanson, City Administrator <br /> <br />DATE: February 8, 2018 <br /> <br />RE: Creation of New TIF District <br /> <br /> <br />With the Suite Living project moving forward on the former Winter property, we need to take steps to <br />create a new tax increment financing (TIF) district to capture that growth to assist with other <br />redevelopment efforts. To do that, staff proposed the district indicated on the attached map. You will <br />notice the proposed district consists of two non-contiguous areas. The first area along Rice Street <br />encompasses the Suite Living project. It also incorporates the Pawn Shop, Liquor Store, and Mach I <br />building. These sites should be included due to their redevelopment potential. They also help us in <br />meeting district qualification tests. <br />The second area along Little Canada Road includes the 93 West Office building, the chiropractor’s <br />office at 75 LC Road, and the Bowling Alley at 61 LC Road. By including this area with the Suite <br />Living project, we create the ability to use funds from one area to benefit another in terms of achieving <br />our redevelopment objectives. <br />To create a new a new TIF district, there are a number of tests that we have to pass. The two major <br />ones that we should be concerned with are as follows: <br />• Coverage Test – 70% of the TIF district must be occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, or <br />paved/gravel parking lots. Each parcel must be evaluated. To be considered “occupied” 15% <br />pf of its area must be “covered” by the required items. On the map previously referred to, the <br />City Engineer has already completed this calculation. The areas proposed will satisfy this test. <br />(It should also be noted that each of the non-contiguous areas needs to meets these <br />requirements on its own.) <br />• Blight Test – More than 50% of the buildings, not including outbuilding, must be structurally <br />substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance and reasonably distributed <br />throughout the geographic area. There are two parts to this analysis. They are: <br />1. A building must meet the definition of “structurally substandard” meaning “containing defects in <br />structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and <br />ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or <br />similar factors, which defects or deficiencies area of sufficient total significance to justify <br />substantial renovation or clearance.”