Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2 <br /> <br />In 2011, the survey area was expanded to include more areas of the City. In 2012, no count was taken due <br />to the lack of snow cover. For 2014, the aerial survey conducted by Ramsey County Parks & Recreation <br />indicated 24 deer were counted within the City limits. This is down from 109 counted in the same areas in <br />2011. In 2015, the survey did not occur due to lack of snow cover. In 2016, there were 21 deer in the NE <br />area of the city noted above, 6 by St. John’s Cemetery, and 5 by St. Jude Medical’s corporate campus for a <br />total of 32. This is 8 more than were counted in 2014 with all of them being located in the NE quadrant. <br />(The 2016 Aerial Count Map is attached as Exhibit A.) In 2017, a count was not taken due to a lack of <br />snow cover. <br />Based on the research conducted by City Staff, biologists indicate a square mile of land in a “natural area” <br />can support about 20 deer. Little Canada is about four (4) square miles in size. Factoring out the <br />developed land, roadways, and lake areas, it becomes reasonable to assume that Little Canada has less than <br />one square mile of “natural area”. As a result, a population of 20 deer or less would be considered <br />sustainable. <br />In 2010, the City also reviewed literature and consulted with other experienced professionals regarding <br />population control options. They were as follows: <br />1. Fertility Control Drugs - Still new and experimental. Very expensive. Estimated cost is $200 to $500 <br />per deer. Very labor intensive - average 8 man-hours per deer. Must be administered to a high percentage <br />of female segments to produce any results. Does not reduce the current population. Future doses may be <br />necessary. Research has not shown this to be a viable solution for urban deer issues. <br /> <br />2. Sharpshooters - This option is expensive. Pricing is likely in the range of $200 to $300 per deer. While <br />this technique has proved effective in other Ramsey County areas, it was felt other options should be <br />initially pursued. <br /> <br />3. Urban Bowhunting Through Metro Bowhunters Resource Base (MBRB) - Most cost-efficient and <br />safe method for reducing urban deer populations. Bowhunters can apply and are required to pass <br />education and proficiency tests before approved to hunt. The City, in conjunction with MBRB, can decide <br />on hunting details to best fit specific situations. Hunting takes place during the State archery season. <br /> <br />4. Allow Private Hunting Through a Permitting Process and Utilizing the Bow and Arrow Deer <br />Hunting Season – This method is used by the City of Vadnais Heights pursuant to set criteria. Given the <br />lack of large, privately owned sites and the concerns about controlling hunter activity, this option has <br />been employed on a very limited basis for large parcel areas (25 acres or greater). In 2010, a permit was <br />granted for the Sculley property at 3000 LaBore Road and one parcel immediately adjoining the Sculley <br />property. The Sculley permit requires all hunters to be pre-identified before the hunt and to provide <br />evidence of “sharpshooter” status with a bow and arrow. The size of this parcel and its critical location <br />relative to deer herd management has been the basis for including this parcel on a “private hunt” basis. In <br />2011, a private hunt permit was also granted to Frank Frattalone for his property located at 3204 Rice <br />Street and 3205 Spruce Street given the large size of these two adjoining parcels and their relative <br />isolation from residential areas. Similar hunter qualification requirements were in place. <br />Options 3 & 4 have been the methods employed by the City of Little Canada. <br />Control Results <br />In the fall of 2009, the City contracted with Metro Bowhunters Resource Base (MBRB), a non-profit organization <br />of bowhunters to conduct a controlled hunt in the area of St. John’s Cemetery and other adjoining lands. 13 deer <br />were removed from that area over three, two-day hunt periods that were spaced three weeks apart. The first hunt <br />resulted in 10 deer being taken. The second yielded three deer and no deer were taken during the last hunt.