My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-06-2018 Council Packet
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
06-06-2018 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2019 10:27:56 AM
Creation date
6/19/2018 3:26:57 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
308
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF LITTLE CANADA, MINNESOTA <br />MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS <br />YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />(25) <br /> <br />The Infrastructure CIP fund had an increase in fund balance of $1,863,130 during 2017 to arrive at an <br />ending fund balance of $2,242,071. This increase is primarily attributable to the reimbursement <br />received from Ramsey County for its share of the Centerville Road project constructed in 2016. <br /> <br />The TIF 6-1 fund had an increase in fund balance of $34,711, to arrive at an ending fund balance of <br />($662,071). This deficit is funded by an interfund loan. <br /> <br />Proprietary Funds <br />The City’s enterprise funds had a combined net position balance of $10,044,187 at December 31, <br />2017. The financial activities of these funds have been summarized in previous charts within this <br />discussion. <br /> <br />General Fund Budgetary Highlights <br /> <br /> Total General Fund revenues were over budget by $114,908. The biggest positive budget <br />variances for revenue categories were within Rents and Refunds. Rents and Refunds exceeded <br />budget by $54,111 due to a greater than anticipated building inspector fees as well as the <br />Sheriffs Credit from Ramsey County. <br /> Total General Fund Expenditures were under budget by $58,359. The biggest positive budget <br />variance for expenditure categories was for Public Works, due to lower than anticipated <br />crackfilling and sealcoating costs.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.