Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION <br />May 3, 2018 <br />adopt the plan. Darling noted that page 5, under Purpose of the Plan, <br />referenced the City of Minneapolis and made a comparison to Little <br />Canada. She explained the plan should not compare Minneapolis to Little <br />Canada because they were not very similar. The Community Services <br />Manager stated while the communities may not be similar the Commission <br />has the same foresight and this was the same language that was used in the <br />2009 Parks Master Plan. Horwath explained the Minneapolis Parks <br />System was first in the country and was a complimentary comparison. <br />Chu suggested it be mentioned in the plan that Minneapolis Parks System <br />is number one. Ray suggested the wording on page five be changed to add <br />a footnote to say The City of Minneapolis is currently one of the best <br />parks systems in the country. <br /> <br />The Community Services Manager noted the Parks Master Planning <br />process has been something the Commission should be proud of <br />completing. It began in April 2017 when the Commission sent the <br />Request for Proposals out, receiving six responses. After narrowing it <br />down to the top four firms, the Commission, City Council, and Staff sat in <br />on the interviews selecting SEH to write the Plan on June 7. Then each <br />Commission member, City Council member, and other community <br />members had an individual interview to share their thoughts. Multiple <br />community engagement events, workshops, and special meetings followed <br />this. A lot of time and effort was put into this document and the <br />Community Services Manager thought that was evident by the final <br />document. <br /> <br />Horwath made a motion to recommend the Parks Master Plan be <br />recommended for adoption by the City Council with a footnote on <br />page 5 that states, “The City of Minneapolis currently has one of the <br />best park systems in the country.” Chu seconded the motion. The <br />motion was unanimously approved. <br /> <br /> <br />The Community Services Manager reported the renovation is almost <br />complete. He explained the pitching mound was reshaped, the infield and <br />outfield were regraded to meet each other more evenly, and the fencing <br />was being put up. The Community Services Manager shared his <br />appreciation for the Little Canada Recreation Association’s (LCRA) <br />funding the project. Chair Miller asked if the plaques would still be put up <br />to thank to LCRA. The Community Services Manager stated there would <br />be one plaque by each dugout. Chu suggested the history behind the <br />naming of the field and Alan Gilbertson be shared on social media. <br /> <br />GILBERTSON <br />FIELD <br />UPDATE