My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-12-2018 Council Packet
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
09-12-2018 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2019 10:27:56 AM
Creation date
9/20/2018 10:30:02 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
181
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING <br />AUGUST 22, 2018 <br />2 <br />how much the property value could increase based on the expected <br />property investment. She explained that an economic development TIF <br />district would allow up to nine years of increment. She stated that <br />economic development TIF districts must be for manufacturing, <br />warehouse or distribution so this buyer’s business would qualify. <br />Ms. Eldridge recommends the district be set up as a pay-as-you-go and <br />reimburse the company as they incur costs, rather than giving the funds <br />upfront. Fischer pointed out that the business is calculating that the <br />property value will be substantially more than it is right now, which is <br />likely not the case since the improvements are to the interior and fixtures <br />and that does not typically increase the property value much. <br />Ms. Eldridge stated there would be administrative costs incurred to set up <br />this district. She explained that it will need to be looked at to see whether <br />enough increment can be captured to make it worth using an economic <br />development TIF district. <br />Keis stated that the realtor mentioned both tax abatement and an economic <br />development district. Ms. Eldridge explained that tax abatement is <br />completely different than TIF. Keis asked how long tax abatement can <br />last. Ms. Eldridge stated the law allows it to go for 15 years, although <br />other factors can allow it to go up to 20 years. <br />Mr. Heineman explained that tax abatement has limits, and it can also be <br />used for road projects, which City has possibly done in the past, so we <br />may want to look at other options instead. Fischer stated he might want to <br />use this option for other projects such as large park improvements that are <br />more difficult to finance, rather than this situation. <br />Ms. Eldrige explained that if the property value after the improvements <br />does not reach what was first estimated, the city only pays out what taxes <br />they actually receive. Mr. Heineman stated that this company prefers to <br />use the State’s Job Creation Fund, and it is rare that both the Jobs Creation <br />Fund and the Minnesota Investment Fund are used. McGraw asked if the <br />City needs to do anything with DEED in order for this company to get <br />funding from the state. Mr. Heineman stated the City would only need to <br />provide a letter of support for the state funding. He noted that DEED has <br />likely done a lot of due diligence on this company in order to agree to fund <br />them. <br />McGraw stated that this buyer is a growing company and he would hate <br />for this building to sit empty. He is not in favor of tax abatement, but <br />there does not seem to be much of a downside to an economic
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.