My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-10-2018 Council Packet
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
10-10-2018 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2019 10:27:56 AM
Creation date
10/12/2018 2:28:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP <br />SEPTEMBER 26, 2018 <br />2 <br />Mr. Hagen stated that he is proposing an Economic Development Tax Increment <br />Financing (TIF) District, which captures the increased portion of the city, county <br />and school district property taxes. Keis noted that the business had originally <br />indicated they were not looking for any other jurisdictions taxes. The City <br />Administrator stated that he thinks they may not have understood the process <br />when they said that. He noted that it would qualify for an economic <br />development TIF District. Mr. Hagen stated that there are limits to tax <br />abatement and the City may want to keep that for other future projects. <br />Keis asked if it is worth it for the business to go through with setting up a TIF <br />District that will not generate a huge amount of money. The City Administrator <br />stated that by partnering with a new business this way, it shows the City wants <br />to be a partner with them, and the property tax value may continue to increase <br />even more than the original $1.5-$2 million. Mr. Hagen stated that it also helps <br />with financing since it keeps their taxes more level for a number of years. The <br />City Administrator stated that all of the discussion so far has been with the <br />CBRE brokers, and there can be further analysis on the businesses actual <br />financial needs. Keis noted that this business is a high water user so the City <br />would generate additional revenue from that. <br />The City Administrator stated that there was a Business Subsidy Policy adopted <br />by the Council in 2007. He explained that this business’s starting wages are a <br />moving target and employees are eligible for two to three wage increases within <br />the probationary period which can raise the lowest wage to $12.00 per hour. He <br />stated that it appears they are paying market level wages. <br />Montour asked what the business’s timeline is. The City Administrator stated <br />that at this point they cannot move forward until they receive the City’s support. <br />He noted that the resolution of support for their DEED Jobs Creation Fund <br />application, and the agreement for a major Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) <br />credit transfer are ready for Council action if the Council chooses. Keis noted <br />that the brokers have indicated that they would like to have some answers from <br />the City by October. Montour asked what happens if the City starts the process <br />for a TIF District, but then residents are against it. The City Administrator <br />stated that the property is zoned for this business to move in and operate with no <br />additional city approvals required. Mr. Hagen stated that the City can set up the <br />TIF District, but then opt out of funding any time prior to final signatures. He <br />noted that the Council could put some conditions on the site operations into the <br />development agreement that would be in play for the nine year life of the <br />district. <br />Fischer stated that he is fine with the SAC credit transfer and DEED support, but <br />is not comfortable with using tax abatement. Montour noted that by giving them
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.