Laserfiche WebLink
22. Are there any types of development or redevelopment you <br /> would strongly oppose? <br /> <br />UNSURE, 4%; NOTHING, 35%; AFFORDABLE HOUSING, 2%; BIG BOX <br />RETAIL, 3%; TOWNHOMES, 6%; AFFORDABLE RENTAL, 8%; LUXURY <br />RENTAL, 6%; HIGHER COST HOUSING, 7%; ASSISTED LIVING, 2%; <br />BARS, 7%; ADULT ENTERTAINMENT, 3%; LOW INCOME HOUSING, 10%; <br />INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSES, 3%; SCATTERED, 4%. <br /> <br />As the City of Little Canada continues redevelopment.... <br /> <br />23. Do you support or oppose the City STRONGLY SUPPORT......12% <br /> providing financial incentives to SUPPORT...............49% <br /> attract specific types of develop- OPPOSE................21% <br /> ment? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do you STRONGLY OPPOSE.......11% <br /> feel strongly that way? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.....8% <br /> <br />Moving on... <br /> <br />As you may know, the City does not patrol neighborhoods to enforce <br />housing and property maintenance codes, but it does respond to and <br />investigate citizen complaints. <br /> <br />24. Do you support or oppose the City STRONGLY SUPPORT......14% <br /> taking a more active approach to SUPPORT...............45% <br />property maintenance and code OPPOSE................29% <br /> enforcement? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) STRONGLY OPPOSE........9% <br /> Do you feel strongly that way? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.....3% <br /> <br />25. How would you rate the general EXCELLENT.............32% <br /> condition and appearance of pro- GOOD..................57% <br /> perties in your neighborhood -- ONLY FAIR.............10% <br /> excellent, good, only fair, or POOR...................1% <br /> poor? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.....0% <br /> <br /> IF “ONLY FAIR” OR “POOR,” ASK: (n=43) <br /> <br /> 26. Why did you rate it as (only fair/poor)? <br /> <br />RUNDOWN PROPERTIES, 44%; WEEDS/TALL GRASS, 18%; JUNK <br />CARS, 12%; VACANT HOMES, 2%; MESSY YARDS, 16%; <br />LITTER, 2%; SCATTERED, 5%. <br /> <br />For each of the following, please tell me whether the City is too <br />tough, about right, or not tough enough in enforcing city codes on <br />the nuisances. <br /> <br /> <br />