Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />TO: Mayor Keis and Members of the City Council <br /> <br />FROM: Joel Hanson <br /> <br />DATE: December 19, 2018 <br /> <br />RE: Phone Reimbursement <br /> <br /> <br />During my performance review conducted in December of 2013, the Council directed me to obtain a <br />cell phone and plan capable of text messaging. (I did not text with my personal cell phone at that time <br />and the City was not reimbursing me for any phone costs.) I was told the City would pay the costs for <br />my phone, but we never formalized that arrangement (that is on me). <br /> <br />I have prepared the attached spreadsheet that has two options for your consideration. The first is <br />based on my costs at the time I upgraded my phone. They are lower than my actual costs due to plan <br />design involving the number of users and data allowances. The plan I purchased was a 10GB Data <br />allowance given it provided the best overall value. However, I did not need that high of an allowance <br />solely for my city usage. Therefore, I based the price on a 2GB option. That would have cost $65 a <br />month for my service only. I also included the cost of the phone I purchased at that time. I purchased <br />a used phone off E-Bay to lessen the cost). <br /> <br />In 2016, I purchased a new phone because the first phone was failing. That phone cost $694.99 but I <br />did receive a $250 rebate that I gave to Lisa (for use at Sam’s Club) based on the assumption the City <br />would be reimbursing me for the phone. Instead, I revised the numbers in the spreadsheet starting in <br />November of 2016 to reflect the added costs of financing (in this way, the City is not paying the full <br />cost). However, I did add the recovery of the $250 phone purchase rebate I gave to Lisa. <br /> <br />The second option is based on the arrangement I (and other employees) have at South St. Paul. In this <br />case, I receive a flat $75 a month to cover all costs. <br /> <br />I used both options for comparative purposes. Given the SSP option is less cost to Little Canada, I <br />would be more than willing to accept that amount as reimbursement (again including the recovery of <br />the $250 rebate) for a total due of $4,075.00 (versus costs of $4,226.37). <br /> <br />Thank you for considering these options. Please let me know if you have comments or questions. <br /> <br />cc: Sharon Provos, Finance Director <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />