Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />League of Minnesota Cities Handbook for Minnesota Cities 10/15/2018 <br />Expenditures, Purchasing, and Contracts Chapter 22 | Page 28 <br /> D. Best value contracting <br />Minn. Stat. § 16C.28. Minn. <br />Stat. § 412.311, subd. 2. <br />Minn. Stat. § 429.041, subd. <br />2a. Minn. Stat. § 469.015, <br />subd. 1a. Minn. Stat. <br />§ 469.068, subd. 1a. Minn. <br />Stat. § 469.101, subd. 5a. <br />Minn. Stat. § 471.345, subds. <br />3a, 4a, and 5. <br />Best value contracting provides an alternative to the competitive bidding <br />process for contracts for construction, building, alteration, improvement, <br />or repair work. A city may award this type of contract to the vendor or <br />contractor offering the best value through the request for proposals process <br />set forth in state law. With best value, cities can consider performance <br />factors, along with price, when awarding construction project contracts. <br />Performance criteria may include (but are not limited to): <br />Rochester City Lines, Co. v. <br />City of Rochester, 868 <br />N.W.2d 655 (Minn. 2015) <br />(holding the “unreasonable, <br />arbitrary, or capricious”’ <br />standard of review applies to <br />a city’s best value bidding <br />process). <br />• Quality of performance on previous projects (this does not include the <br />exercise or assertion of a person’s legal rights). <br />• Timeliness of performance on previous projects. <br />• Level of customer satisfaction on previous projects. <br />• Record of performing previous projects on budget and ability to <br />minimize cost overruns. <br />• Ability to minimize change orders. <br />• Ability to prepare appropriate project plans. <br />• Technical capabilities. <br />• Qualifications of key personnel. <br />• Ability to assess and minimize risks. <br />Minn. Stat. § 16C.28, subd. <br />1(c). A city’s request for proposal (RFP) must set forth the criteria used to <br />evaluate best value contracting. The RFP also must state the relative <br />weight assigned to price, as well as to other selection criteria. If an <br />interview of the vendor or contractor’s personnel represents a factor in the <br />selection criteria, the RFP must specify the relative weight of the interview <br />and must apply it accordingly. <br />Minn. Stat. § 16C.28, subd. <br />1a (c). It appears that cities are limited to using best value contracting for either <br />one project annually or 20 percent of their projects, whichever is greater, <br />for the first three fiscal years in which best value contracting is used. <br /> E. Exemptions <br /> In the absence of a statutory or charter requirement, a city need not <br />advertise for bids. Cities may choose to advertise for bids, however, even <br />if the law does not require them to do so. Cities need not follow the <br />competitive bidding process for the following types of contracts. <br /> 1. Professional services <br />Krohnberg v. Pass, 187 <br />Minn. 73, 244 N.W. 329 <br />(Minn. 1932). <br />Cities do not have to use the competitive bidding process when contracting <br />for professional services, such as those of doctors, engineers, lawyers,