Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 8/3/2018 <br />Planning Commission Guide Page 7 <br /> As a result, the comprehensive plan normally lays out a vision for the city’s <br />future land development and land use, dictating where growth should occur, <br />the type of growth that is allowed in various areas of the city, and the density <br />of such growth. However, a comprehensive plan also may include a: <br />Minn. Stat. § 462.352, subd. <br />8. <br />Minn. Stat. § 462.352, subd. <br />7. <br />Minn. Stat. § 462.352, subd. <br />8. <br />Minn. Stat. § 462.352, subd. <br />9. <br />• Public or community facilities plan. <br />• Thoroughfare or transportation plan. <br />• Parks and open space plan. <br />• Capital improvement program. <br /> While not all cities are required to adopt a comprehensive plan, a plan is still <br />a good practice for a couple of reasons. First, once a plan is adopted, it <br />guides local officials in making their day-to-day decisions and becomes a <br />factor in their decision-making process. <br /> Second, preparing a comprehensive plan prior to the adoption of a zoning <br />ordinance also affords the city additional legal protections if a particular <br />ordinance provision is challenged in court. Zoning ordinances must be <br />reasonable and have a rational basis. Comprehensive plans assist a city in <br />articulating the basis for its zoning decisions. Usually the courts will not <br />question the policies and programs contained in a comprehensive plan <br />adopted by a local community, or question the ordinances based upon the <br />plan, unless the particular zoning provision appears to be without any <br />rational basis, or clearly exceeds the city’s regulatory authority. <br />Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd <br />2. <br />Minn. Stat. § 462.352, subd. <br />6. <br />Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. <br />2 (c). <br />If a city is not able to develop a comprehensive plan prior to adopting a <br />zoning ordinance, the zoning ordinance should be adopted in conjunction <br />with extensive, written finding of facts, stating the policy reasons that <br />necessitate the ordinance’s adoption. <br /> 2. Preparing the comprehensive plan <br />Minn. Stat. § 462.355, subd. <br />1. <br />Minn. Stat. § 462.355, subd. <br />2. <br />State statute vests authority for preparing the comprehensive plan in the <br />planning commission. However, the city council also may propose the <br />comprehensive municipal plan and amendments to the plan by a resolution <br />submitted to the planning commission. When this occurs, the council may <br />not adopt the recommended language until it has received a report from the <br />planning commission or 60 days have elapsed. <br /> The plan may be prepared and adopted in sections, each of which relates to a <br />major subject of the plan, or to a major geographical section of the <br />municipality. <br />Minn. Stat. § 462. 353, subd <br />2. Cities are authorized to collect and analyze data; prepare maps, charts, <br />tables, and other illustrations and displays; and conduct necessary studies <br />when developing a comprehensive plan. Cities also may hire planning <br />consultants and other experts to assist in drafting their plan.