My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-22-2019 Council Packet
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
05-22-2019 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2019 2:05:42 PM
Creation date
7/8/2019 1:50:28 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MAY 9, 2019 <br /> <br /> - 4 - <br />Filler stated that his property tax statement indicates that he has more land <br />than is shown on the map. The Associate Planner explained that a survey <br />would be required when a building permit is applied for. <br /> <br />Johnson clarified that everything the applicant has proposed is conforming <br />to the I-P District except for the outdoor storage. She stated that she is <br />enthusiastic about this project, and understands that outdoor storage is very <br />important to the applicant. She agreed the Planning Commission should <br />review the outdoor storage code to make sure they are meeting the needs. <br /> <br />Mr. Holm stated that the outdoor storage is essential to their needs and <br />growth. <br /> <br />The Planning Associate explained that staff had met with the applicant a <br />few times and based on the fact that they could meet all of the I-P <br />requirements, it was determined that a variance would be what they are <br />requesting rather than rezoning the property. She asked if there is a lower <br />amount of outdoor storage that the applicant could work with versus the 60 <br />percent. Schwalbach noted that he understands the outdoor storage needs <br />and understands that it is an important piece of the applicant’s business. <br />He asked if this could be tabled so the Planning Commission could review <br />the city code. The Planning Associate explained that the applicant has <br />asked for 60 percent, but she stated that the Planning Commission could <br />approve a lower amount. Mr. Holm stated that he cannot continue to grow <br />without more space. Schwalbach asked if it could be rezoned in order to <br />allow them more outdoor storage. The Planning Associate explained that it <br />would be spot zoning to rezone the property only to allow the additional <br />outdoor storage when the applicant can meet all of the existing zoning <br />requirements except for one. <br /> <br />Buesing asked about the 36 month delay. The Planning Associate <br />explained that the applicant stated that there are things to work out prior to <br />being able to start construction. Buesing asked when On-Site would start <br />construction. Mr. Holm explained that it would depend on how long it <br />takes Buck Blacktop to vacate the property. <br /> <br />Uldis Erdmanis, owner of 32 South Owasso Boulevard West and Buck <br />Blacktop, reviewed why he feels the site is challenged, and he has not been <br />able to find a buyer for an I-P District property. He stated that as far as the <br />interim use, there would no increase in the amount of outdoor storage and <br />noted that there is screening along the front. He explained that he could <br />vacate the site fairly quickly. <br /> <br />Schwalbach stated that he thinks this is a great use of the property due the <br />unique shape. He stated he could go either way, but as long as they will
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.