My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-09-2019 Planning Commission Minutes
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
05-09-2019 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2019 7:17:08 PM
Creation date
7/11/2019 7:17:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MAY 9, 2019 <br />resolution for the lot combination included a condition that stated "any <br />future request for the re -subdivision of this property will require that access <br />for the new lot come from Keller Parkway and that the Labore Road access <br />cannot be reestablished She noted that Mr. Yargici is forthcoming in his <br />awareness of this condition when he purchased the property, but is asking <br />that this be reconsidered. <br />The Associate Planner indicated that the site plan submitted by Mr. Yargici <br />is a concept plan rather than the final survey that will be required by <br />Ramsey County. She noted that these lots will have lake access equal to <br />the lot frontage along Keller Parkway which is not reflect on the site plans <br />submitted. However, the applicant wanted to proceed with the review as <br />submitted. <br />The Associate Planner reported that in his narrative Mr. Yargici has <br />identified an understanding of the code provisions in the Shoreland <br />Ordinance, but does not provide the actual plan. She stated that given the <br />complexity of the grades along Keller Parkway, if the Planning <br />Commission is amenable to the current plan, city staff would recommend <br />as a condition of the subdivision approval that this be approved in concept <br />plan stage only. <br />The Associate Planner reported that the City Engineer has indicated that the <br />information submitted does not provide the needed information to <br />determine feasibility for two lots to be subdivided along Keller Parkway <br />either. City staff believes that due diligence needs to be completed by the <br />property owner to provide that documentation before any final approval is <br />granted. <br />The Associate Planner explained that Mr. Yargici is seeking a variance to <br />the minimum lot width requirements for Lots 1 and 2 and a variance to the <br />paving side yard setback on Lot 3. She reported that the applicant has <br />indicated in his narrative that the primary basis for granting the variances is <br />due to the steep driveway grades that would be needed if the properties <br />were accessed from Keller Parkway. In addition from an environmental <br />standpoint, the erosion and disturbance impacts to the shoreland can be <br />minimized with the proposed layout. <br />The Associate Planner reviewed the first variance request and explained <br />that all three lots comply with the lot area requirements for both zoning <br />districts, and the lot width requirement complies for all three properties <br />along Keller Parkway. She noted that Lots 1 and 2 would be considered <br />double frontage lots by definition of city code. She explained that Lots 1 <br />and 2 as proposed do not comply with the 75-foot lot -width requirement on <br />thetabore Road frontage as required by both districts. She reported that <br />IRM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.