My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-28-01 Council Workshop Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
03-28-01 Council Workshop Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2009 2:40:20 PM
Creation date
8/6/2008 9:20:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />MARCH 28, 2001 <br />first floor of the building would be retail and the two upper floors would be <br />office. Rents for the office would be anticipated at $12.50 per square foot. <br />Project costs are estimated at approximately $4.2 million, and in addition to the <br />land, these developers anticipated the need to reduce project costs by <br />$550,000. (In this discussion they did not ask for a City subsidy and the City <br />would keep the TIF revenue.) <br />Rusty Fifield, Ehlers & Associates, reported that the building would consist of <br />30,000 to 33,000 square feet. He noted that excess TIF dollars generated from <br />Park Place as well as Country Drive could be used to assist this project. He <br />also noted that the project would not be totally risk free given the potential for <br />class rate compression and the TIF guarantee. Fifield suggested that the City <br />could take an equity position in the project that would be subordinate to the <br />first mortgage. If the building were then sold, once the mortgage was satisfied, <br />the City's project assistance would be reimbursed if there were adequate funds <br />to do so. <br />Scalze asked if Oppidan would retain the building as an investment or if it was <br />being constructed and would then be sold. The City Administrator was not <br />sure at this point. He reported that the developers indicated that they would <br />want to have one floor of the office space rented before they would begin <br />construction. <br />Montour indicated that he agreed with the concept of combined retail and <br />office. He pointed out that providing the land and $500,000 in subsidies will <br />result in $1.4 million of assistance from the City. Anderson asked how the <br />City would recover this money. The City Administrator replied that the money <br />would be recovered through TIF generated from this project and excess TIF <br />from other projects. <br />Fifield indicated that Oppidan is seeking a slightly lower return on investment <br />at approximately 11% than was R. A. Morton & Associates at approximately <br />15%. <br />The City Administrator indicated that it may be possible to structure the deal <br />so that the amount of the City's assistance to the project would appreciate in <br />value at the same rate that the building value appreciates. <br />Fahey suggested that the result would be a 12.5% limited equity partnership for <br />the City in this project. This is based on a $500,000 subsidy to a $4.2 million <br />project. <br />The City Administrator reviewed projected cash flow information on <br />$1,615,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds for this project. He also <br />reviewed information on sources of tax increment from the Park Place project, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.