Laserfiche WebLink
1VI INUTUS <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />SEPTEMT3ER 2G, 2007 <br />KAPPROVAI, OI^' KIMMF.b'/GILANDER] AD))7TION DEVELOPMENT <br />AGREEMENT AND A UTHOR]ZING TF7E MAYOR AM) CITY <br />ADIYIINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE THF., AGREEMENT ON73EHALF OF <br />THE CITY <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Scalze. <br />Ayes (4) LaValle, Scalze, Fahey, Montour. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />CONDIT The City Administrator reported that he met with Mr. and Mrs. Zoch <br />STREUT to discuss issues relating to the final plat for Yorkton North Phase II <br />RIGHT-OF-WAY and right-of--way for Condit Street. At the time the final plat was approved in <br />May of 1985, the Council's direction was that 8.5 feet of additional right-of- <br />way was to come from the west side of Condit Street. I-Iowever, the final plat <br />which was recorded with the County and signed by the parties involved, <br />including Mr. and Mrs. Zoch, took 73.5 feet ofright-of--way fiom the west side <br />of Condit Street. The Zoch's are questioning the appropriateness of this action <br />and would like to be compensated for the additional 5 feet that was taken, or <br />the property returned to them. <br />Mrs. Zoch indicated that they did not want to be involved in the Yorkton North <br />Phase II plat, however, the City Council convinced them that this development <br />was the best they could hope for for the area. Mrs. Zoch indicated that they <br />really had not wanted Co sell any of their property. However, they agreed to <br />sell provided that Larry Lee, the developer, paid all the expenses. Mrs. Zoch <br />pointed out that there had been some deferred assessments on their property <br />that were to have been paid, and they just discovered recently that they had not <br />been paid. The City Administrator pointed out that the City abated those <br />assessments in 1999 at the Zoch's request and subject to execution of a waiver <br />of claims relating to a fence that was not constructed on the site. <br />Mrs. Zoch pointed out that when the plat was approved in May of 1985, there <br />was 33 feet ofright-of--way for Condit Street. The Council's position at the <br />time was that 8.5 feet of additional right-of way should come from each side of <br />the street with the end result to be the 50-foot standard right-of way. Mrs. <br />Zoch indicated that it was their understanding that 8.5 feet would come fi~om <br />their property for the west side of Condit. However, they had their property <br />surveyed two years ago and discovered that 73S feet was actually taken from <br />them. Mrs. Zoch also indicated that in 7985 they were informed that their <br />property would actually run to the middle of the street since the road would <br />exist via an easement rather than dedicated right-oi=way. Mrs. Zoch <br />acknowledged that they had an attorney representing their interests, and their <br />attorney told them everything was fine. As a result of their survey, Mrs. "Loch <br />iz <br />