09-26-01 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES CITY COUNCIL S CP'T~MI3BI2 2G, 2001 Fahey felt that the City should resolve the issue of the additional 5 feet for Condit Street and compensate the Zoch's for this propeiYy. Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RF.SOL UTION NO. 2(101-9-209 - A IITHORIZING PAYMENT TO MR. AND MIZS. MARCF.1.7.OCF7 FOR THE ADDITIONAL FIVE FEET OF CONDIT STREET RIGHT-OKWAI' THAT WAS TAKENAS PART OF THF. PORI~TON NORTH PHASF, II P7 AT IN 1985 AS DISCUSSED THIS EVENING IN E~'CHAiVGE FOR A WAIVER OF ANY CLAIMS RELATIVE TO THLS MATTER The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by LaValle. Ayes (4) Fahey, LaValle, Montour, Scalze. Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. RIC.HIr The Cit}~ Administrator reported that Mr. Bill Schorr would like to pursue COVC+NANT the division of a lot from the .Richie property. The Administrator pointed AG~RI;EM~I;NT out that there was a subdivision of the Richie property approved in 2000. At the time of subdivision approval, the Council required a covenant agreement that there would be no additional divisions of this property. This covenant was required since the City was considering adoption of a thoroughfare plan for the area. The Administrator pointed out that since that time, the Council has decided not to formerly adopt athoroughfare plan The Administrator also pointed out that the thoroughfare plan that was being considered did not contemplate a road connection to LaBore Road through the Richie property. Scalze pointed out that should Mr. Schorr pursue another division of the Richie property, the land in the back would essentially be landlocked. The City Planner replied that this was correct, and the only way to develop the back of the Richie property would be to improve a road in the back. The City Planner pointed out that at the meeting the City had with property owners in the area, they were informed that without a road improvement, their back properties would be landlocked. Bill Schorr stated that Mr. Richie is aware that if he divides another loi along LaBore Road, he back property is landlocked. The City Administrator reported that the covenant has never been executed and the first property division that Mr. Richie requested has not been finalized. Fahey stated that his concern would be that the back property would be landlocked, and then in the future the City would be approached with a development proposal for the Richie property for additional lots in the back 14