My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-26-00 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
04-26-00 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2009 2:24:19 PM
Creation date
8/6/2008 10:41:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />APRIL 2G, 2000 <br />Fahey felt that a liquor license increase should not be enacted this year <br />given the Little Canada Road improvement project which will impact at <br />least three of the City's liquor establishments. <br />Scalze felt that rather than discuss liquor license fees each year, the <br />Council should set a schedule of what the fees will be for the next couple <br />of years. Fahey suggested that increases not be planned for in the budget <br />LaValle pointed out that liquor establishments pay more taxes than the <br />average property owner in the budget. Therefore, he was opposed to an <br />increase in liquor license fees seeing this as additional taxation. <br />Fahey asked if an analysis of the cost-per-call for police protection could <br />be done comparing a retail or commercial business with a liquor <br />establishment. Fahey felt such an analysis would show whether liquor <br />businesses are paying their fair share or if they are being subsidized by <br />other property owners in the City. <br />The City Administrator indicated that he would do a tax analysis <br />comparing taxes with number of police calls at various businesses to see <br />of there is a correlation. He also pointed out that two squad caps are sent <br />to calls at liquor establishments and pointed out that this takes resources <br />away from other areas. This report will be presented to the Council later <br />in the year so they can discuss fees for the 2001/2002 licensing cycle. <br />Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2000-4-707 - RF.TAININC TILE CURRENT FEE <br />b"TI2UCTURE FOR ON--SALE LIQUOR ESTA131,ISFIMENTS <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by LaValle. <br />Ayes (5) Fahey, LaValle, Pedersen, Scalze, Morelan. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />CONSENT Mr. LaValle introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />AGENDA <br />RF.SO1. UTION NO. 2000-4-108 -APPROVING THE CONSENT <br />AGENDA WHICH CON'I'f17N.S THE FOLLOWING: <br />xAWARDING OF 131D.S FOR SEALCOATING OF CERTAIN CITY <br />b'TREETb" A.S RECOMMENDED ]3Y THE PUI37.IC WORKS <br />DIRECTOR; <br />i~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.