Laserfiche WebLink
OPPENHEIMER <br />OPPENHEIM E0. WOLFf 8 DONNELLY LLF <br />Planning Commission <br />July 11, 2000 <br />Page Two <br />their previous builder, such misunderstandings do not provide a basis for granting <br />the variance. Rather, it is quite likely that if the O'Neils had disclosed their <br />intentions to have access from Lal3ore Road to the new lot, the recommendations <br />of NAC would not have supported the subdivision and there would have been <br />sufficient opposition from the adjoining land owners to have caused the requested <br />subdivision to have been denied. <br />3. Reasonable Alternatives -The letter dated June 26, 2000 from Thomas Leonzal of <br />College City Homes to the City of Little Canada does not state that the lot, as <br />subdivided, is not buildable. The letter implies that the O'Neils and the builder <br />would need to alter their initial plans in order to comply with City building codes. <br />Clearly, such compliance is preferable to granting a variance where no such <br />variance is necessary or warranted. <br />Eric Netteberg will be attending the Planning Commission meeting, together with other <br />adjoining land owners, to discuss the above and other concerns. Please call me if you have any <br />questions. <br />Sincerely, <br />OPPENHEIMER WOLFF & DONNELLY LLP <br />~, _ - c,/J <br />~~ Julie A. Wrase <br />cc: Mr. Joel R. Hanson <br />Page 30 ~~~ G7G817 Yoi ovizizooo <br />