Laserfiche WebLink
MIN. REG. MEETING <br />NOV 20 1972 <br />Cont. <br />Hearings <br />cont. <br />73-3 <br />IMP 73-3 NOEL DR, <br />NOEL DR WATERMAIN-APPURTENANCE-RESTORATION, <br />WATERMAIN <br />PROPOSED ESTIMITED COST ..............$ 56,457.50 <br />(estimited cost, includes, construction, engineering ) <br />(easements and administrati®e cost.j <br />PROPOSED ASSESSMENT: <br />FRONT FOOTAGE: ........ $ 7.50 <br />Water Box ............... $ 200.00 <br />Unit Charge ............. $ 250.00 <br />During the discussion it was pointed out that <br />the estimited cost do not inclued, the cvatermeeter <br />which is $ 80.00 nor the cost of constructing the <br />water Line from the street to the house. <br />There was also some discussion concerning the manner <br />in which the streets will be restored. <br />OBJECTORS <br />Mr. Howard Mostesd277.0 Noel Dr. <br />Mr. George Johnson. 2750 Noel Dr. <br />Mr. Johnson also stated that some of the residents <br />who had signed the petition for the service may <br />request to Ue removed from the petition. <br />It was pointed out during the discussion that 35% <br />of property owners is all that is necessary to <br />call for a hearing. It was also stated that the 35% <br />means feet of property not 35 % of owners, and <br />footage means that feet which is to he assessed. <br />UPON THE MOTLON OF MR. CHLEBECK AND SECONHID BY <br />MR. ANDERSON, <br />BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THAT: <br />THE HEARING FOR IMP. 73-3 <br />WATERMAIN FOR NOEL DR IS <br />HERESY TABLED, FOR FURTHER <br />DISCUSSION, <br />AYES: MESSRS: ANDERSON, CHLEBECR,DEBACE, RUDY & MAKEEFF <br />NAYES: 0 RESOLUTION CARRIED. <br />THERE IS SOME QUESTION IF THE PETITION PRESENTED <br />CONTAINS 35 % OF THE FOOTAGE REQUIRED. <br />page 5 <br />