My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-18-72 Councl Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1972
>
12-18-72 Councl Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/12/2008 11:28:47 AM
Creation date
8/12/2008 11:27:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Min. Reg, Meeting <br />Dec 18 1972 <br />Cont, <br />Maintenance <br />Mr, De Bace, <br />WATER MAIN IMP, Mr. Johnson, one of the owners of the Johnsons <br />Lake St, 73.5 Bros. tJell Co. Located at 2750 Noel Dxive9 approcahed the <br />Noel Dr. 73-3 Council with a petition from residents on Noel Dr9 against <br />the proposed water main improvement on Noel Dr. <br />As it appears there are as many for the Imp- <br />rovement as well as against the improvement. <br />Mr, De Bace stated that he will check the <br />petition with Mr, Gotwald and he also stated he will <br />check the matter with the residents on the block, <br />Since no action was taken on the matter, the <br />improvement remain tabled until the next regular meeting, <br />There was some discussion concerning the essence <br />of a petition. It has been stated that it takes 35 °/, in <br />frontage of real propexty abutting on a street to initiate <br />the proceeding for an improvement hearing. The question <br />concerning the council9is a petition to be based on the num- <br />ber of signatures or the amount of footage proposed to be <br />assed in the improvement, <br />The engineer pointed out that the assessment for <br />improvement is against the property not persons, The assessemnt <br />is based on footage, and the petition is based on frontage, <br />The attorney pointed that9if a person owns 90% <br />of the front footage proposed to be assessed on a improvement <br />and to other persons own 10 °(, of the prop erty proposed to be <br />assessed, the person with the 90 % may have moxe priority, <br />Mr, De Bace informed the Council that majority of <br />the residence on Lake St. are for the proposed improvement, <br />Upon the motion of Mr, De Bace and seconded by <br />Mr. Rudy, it was resolved theta <br />t4hereast Pursuant to a Council <br />Resolution adopted on the 18th <br />day of Sept 19729 whereby the <br />Council fixed a date for a hearing <br />on the following proposed improvem- <br />ents, ( watermain) <br />Imp, 73- 1 Eli Rd, <br />Imp, 73- 2 Racine Dr, <br />Imp, 73- 3 Noel Dr, <br />Imp, 73. 4 Austraiian <br />Imp, 73- 5 Lake St, <br />page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.