My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-13-08 Council Workshop Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
08-13-08 Council Workshop Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 1:19:01 PM
Creation date
8/18/2008 2:06:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />AUGUST 13, 2008 <br />The discussed returned to property inspections with concern expressed <br />relative to the cost of private inspections. The Administrator pointed out <br />that that is an option as is the use of HUD inspections and/or City <br />inspections. The Administrator pointed out that a couple of the multi- <br />family properties trigger the need for inspections. <br />Montour asked about the license fee and suggested that a sliding fee might <br />be feasible with well-run and maintained properties paying less than <br />problem properties. The City Administrator noted the three levels of <br />participation in the STAR Program. He then pointed out the license fee <br />scheduled used in Golden Valley which is based on that participation. The <br />Adminisriā¢ator noted that moving to STAR Level A can be difficult for <br />complexes that have frequent turn-over in managers. <br />McGraw indicated that he had more empathy for people who are forced <br />into renting their properties than with management companies of large <br />complexes. He noted that this is a business and these management <br />companies understand what business is about. <br />There was discussion about the Ruth Street 4-plexes and the varying level <br />of property management that occurs in these complexes. <br />The City Administrator reported that he would make some adjustments to <br />the Violations and Penalties Section of the proposed ordinance based on <br />tonight's discussion. Again, McGraw stated that there should be <br />incentives for well-iun properties. <br />The Council then discussed the proposed license fee noting that the fee <br />must be supportable. The Administrator again noted that the intent was to <br />not penalize well-run properties, but to try to cover the costs associated <br />with poorly managed properties. <br />Blesener suggested a license fee of $100/building and $5/unit for the first <br />year to get the program underway and provide time for rental properties to <br />become certified under the STAR program. The Administrator felt that a <br />number of the multi-family complexes may be close to certification. <br />Keis asked if mobile home parks would be subject to the ordinance. The <br />Administrator indicated that he had not contemplated including them, <br />pointing out that in mobile home parks the units are owned and the land is <br />rented. <br />Montour stated that he liked Golden Valley's fee schedule. The <br />Adminisriā¢ator noted that it is tied to level of participation in the STAR <br />Program. Montour also indicated that he supported the Mayor's <br />suggestion that the complexes be given a year to get STAR certification. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.