My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-26-2021 Workshop Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
05-26-2021 Workshop Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2021 2:08:51 PM
Creation date
6/28/2021 2:08:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WORKSHOP MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />MAY 269 2021 <br />Mr. Weber stated there had been Council agreement at the last workshop to go back to the pre- <br />2008 smaller square footage lot requirements. Fischer stated his concerns are for the <br />redeveloped properties, and how the updated Zoning Code could affect existing neighbors. He <br />stated that someone buying a house in a new development area will know exactly where the <br />neighbor's house is, but it is the infill homes that he is concerned about. Keis stated that smaller <br />lots sizes should not affect things since the setback requirements are not changing much. <br />2. Minimum lot width for detached houses in the R-1 and R-2 districts: Should the <br />minimum lot width for a new detached house in the R-1 and R-2 zoning districts be reduced? <br />The R-1 district was a minimum of 75 feet wide until 2008 when it was increased to 85 feet. <br />The minimum lot width in the R-2 district is 75 feet. <br />Fischer stated he would like to see the rationale of the Council from 2008 and why they amended <br />the lot size minimums before he agrees to this change. <br />3. Two-family dwellings in the R-1 zoning district <br />The updated code would allow two-family dwellings as Conditional Uses on corner lots in <br />the R-1 district. The minimum lot size for an R-1 corner lot is 11,000 square feet. The <br />building would have to be judged to be architecturally compatible with others in the <br />immediate vicinity. <br />Mr. Weber reported that the Council seemed agreeable to allowing a two-family home on corner <br />lots, but he suggested also allowing them on interior lots, possibly as a conditional use. He <br />stated that there would be few locations this would be feasible, and would likely need to be a <br />situation where a single-family home is demolished. Fischer stated that since there would not be <br />many options to build a duplex, then maybe we should not consider allowing it. Fischer stated <br />there seemed to be agreement for a duplex on a corner lot so that should be decided. Keis stated <br />he is fine with a duplex on a corner lot, McGraw is generally not supportive but is willing to <br />consider it, and Torkelson supports it. <br />Fischer stated that the zoning code update started with simple cleaning it up and unweaving the <br />complicated things, and now it has turned into a lot of changes and he is concerned. McGraw <br />stated that he would like to just concentrate on cleaning up the commercial districts. Torkelson <br />agreed. <br />Mr. Weber explained that Rice Street is where the potential is for some change. He stated he is <br />proposing to create a new zoning district along Rice Street and some of Little Canada Road that <br />is west of I-35E, called "Corridor Mixed Use" that would allow retail, office and high -density <br />housing. Torkelson stated that he would prefer the Terrace Heights Manufactured Home Park be <br />designated as Corridor Mixed Use rather than just retail. Mr. Weber explained that the <br />Comprehensive Plan states that the manufactured home parks should be protected as much as <br />they want to be in order to save this affordable housing. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.