My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-26-2020 Council Packet
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
08-26-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2022 3:06:55 PM
Creation date
1/13/2022 2:56:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9 <br />Planning Evaluation Tool <br />Background <br />The purpose of the Planning Evaluation Tool is to assess community feedback and ideas so <br />that community input can be strategically considered during the City planning process. The use <br />of structured questions to assess and prioritize community feedback has proven to be an <br />effective guide for strategic decision making that has been successfully employed by other <br />municipalities (e.g. City of Ann Arbor, 2017; City of Palo Alto, 2016; Khazaei, Joppe, & Elliot, <br />2019; Naperville Park District, 2011). This tool presents guided questions that City staff and <br />decision makers in the City of Little Canada should take into account when evaluating <br />community feedback and ideas related to community parks. <br /> <br />This tool aims to consider how community feedback and ideas relate to or fulfill community <br />understandings of Equity, Accessibility, Sustainability, Diversity, and Community, as defined in <br />the RCP Fellows Final Report. It also encourages decision makers to look beyond funding, cost, <br />and other quantitative performance data (Parker, 2016) and instead consider how the feedback <br />or idea reflects previous community input, amplifies the voices of marginalized stakeholders, <br />and aligns with previously established City goals and recommendations. <br /> <br />It is important to note that this tool does not weigh or offer criteria for prioritizing input. <br />However, the use of guided questions to analyze community feedback and ideas can reveal <br />critical insights that make the prioritization process easier when comparing suggestions <br />side-by-side. <br />References <br />City of Ann Arbor. (2017). Parks & Recreation Open Space Plan. <br />https://www.a2gov.org/departments/Parks-Recreation/administrative/Documents/FINA <br />L%202016-2020%20PROS%20PLAN.pdf <br /> <br />City of Palo Alto. (2016). Study Session on the Parks, Trails, Natural Open Space and <br />Recreation Master Plan. <br />https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/50367 <br /> <br />Khazaei, A., Joppe, M., & Elliot, S. (2019). Mapping a diverse community's engagement in <br />parks planning. Leisure Sciences, 41(4), 294-312. <br />doi:10.1080/01490400.2018.1410740 <br /> <br />Naperville Park District. (2011). Naperville Park District Capital Projects Prioritization Policy.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.