My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-14-2020 Workshop Packet
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
10-14-2020 Workshop Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2022 3:37:56 PM
Creation date
1/13/2022 3:09:40 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
mitigating or responding to the COVID-19 public health emergency is eligible, provided <br />that such payroll costs are incurred by December 30, 2020. <br />(b) For payroll that was accounted for in the FY2020 budget but was then "presumed" to be <br />substantially dedicated to mitigating the emergency, will the government have to <br />demonstrate/substantiate that a public health or public safety employee's function was a <br />substantially different use? <br />No, the government will not have to demonstrate/substantiate that a budgeted public <br />health or public safety employee’s function was a substantially different use. As stated <br />in Treasury’s Guidance, within the category of substantially different uses, Treasury has <br />included payroll and benefits expenses for public safety, public health, health care, <br />human services, and similar employees whose services are substantially dedicated to <br />mitigating or responding to the COVID-19 public health emergency. The Treasury OIG <br />does require the government to maintain budgetary records to support the fiscal years <br />2019 and 2020 budgets. <br />71. Is the government required to perform any analysis or maintain documentation of the “substantially <br />dedicated” conclusion for payroll expenses of public safety, public health, health care, and human <br />service employees? <br />No, the government is not required to perform an analysis or maintain documentation of the <br />substantially dedicated conclusion for payroll expenses of public safety, public health, health <br />care, and human service employees. As indicated in Treasury’s Guidance, as an administrative <br />accommodation, governments may presume that public health and public safety employees <br />meet the substantially dedicated test, unless the chief executive (or equivalent) of the relevant <br />government determines that specific circumstances indicate otherwise. <br />Business Outreach and Assistance <br />Staff will update Council at the workshop regarding use of the CARES Act funds for business <br />assistance. <br />ATTACHMENTS <br />1. CARES Act Funding Summary with details for August Report, September Report, and possible <br />Future Reports <br />2. Possible Resolution relating to Public Safety <br />3. Minnesota Management and Budget (MMB) Category Explanations for Reporting
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.