My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-11-2021 Planning Commission Minutes
>
Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
02-11-2021 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2022 4:47:38 PM
Creation date
1/13/2022 4:47:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />FEBRUARY 11, 2021 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />Mr. Weber stated that lot size could also be an applicable condition. He confirmed that staff <br />could work to develop a list of conditions for the Commission to review. <br /> <br />Chair Schwalbach stated that he could see that some neighborhoods would not be good fits for <br />ADU’s, as it would increase density in already dense areas and therefore believed that the <br />conditions should be relatively specific to ensure that the ADU would not impact the surrounding <br />properties and neighborhood. <br /> <br />Mr. Weber provided an example in which the ADU is a very large and towering structure. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson commented that could easily be addressed by stating that the ADU could <br />not exceed the height of the existing principal structure. <br /> <br />The Community Development Director stated that an ADU could provide an opportunity for <br />affordable housing as well as offering an opportunity for someone to have an aging relative live <br />on their property but maintain some independence. <br /> <br />Mr. Weber reviewed the proposed changes to the dimensional standards and setbacks within the <br />residential districts. He provided additional information on the definition of front of the lot. <br /> <br />Chair Schwalbach referenced a recent plat where the City allowed a lesser lot width. He asked <br />for information on lot width and what other communities are using in order to address the market <br />demands. <br /> <br />Mr. Weber commented that Little Canada only has a small amount of land left to develop as low <br />density residential as there are only two properties remaining. <br /> <br />The Community Development Director stated that there has been some discussion related to <br />allowing smaller lot sizes to fit with the present market demands and perhaps there could be <br />additional discussion on that topic if that is desired, noting that would increase density within R- <br />1. She stated that the discussion could be related to current and future trends as there may be <br />more opportunity for lot splits in the future. <br /> <br />Chair Schwalbach commented that this would seem like the appropriate time to consider that <br />when the Code is being updated. <br /> <br />Commissioner Buesing stated that perhaps lot depth is also considered, as a smaller width would <br />not necessarily require that depth. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson stated that in the previous development the Commission reviewed there <br />were 65-foot lots. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.