My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-08-2021 Planning Commission Minutes
>
Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
04-08-2021 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2022 4:47:38 PM
Creation date
1/13/2022 4:47:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />APRIL 8, 2021 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />5 <br />Mr. Weber commented that community input would still be allowed through staff, similar to any <br />site plan that would be proposed to be reviewed by staff. He recognized that those uses generate <br />a lot of traffic. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson asked if the previous school was a conditional use permit which is why is <br />came before the Planning Commission and whether that type of use would be reviewed by the <br />Commission in the future. <br /> <br />Chair Schwalbach commented that the school on Country Drive was within a commercial <br />district. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson commented that she was simply using that as an example of an issue that <br />the community wanted an opportunity to have input and be heard. She recognized the desire to <br />streamline the process for certain types of applications but stated that some applications would <br />still benefit from the opportunity for public discussion. <br /> <br />Mr. Weber commented that perhaps there should be a tool that would allow staff to defer the <br />application to a review by the Planning Commission and Council. He noted that there could be a <br />trigger, such as a level of public comments. <br /> <br />The Community Development Director agreed that there could be thresholds developed that <br />would trigger an application to go before the Commission and Council. She provided an <br />overview of the engagement schedule involving business owners. She provided additional <br />details on those included in the business community outreach thus far and noted that she will also <br />have a focus group of small business owners in May. She reviewed the themes identified thus <br />far by the business owner stakeholder group. <br /> <br />Mr. Weber commented that he is pleased with the feedback received and noted that it seems that <br />the amendments seem to be on track for the business community. ‘ <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson thanked the Community Development Director for including this <br />portion. She stated that often changes are implemented without gaining input from the business <br />community that is impacted. She stated that the input is very valuable. <br /> <br />The Community Development Director agreed that engagement is an important process and <br />provides valuable input from different perspectives. <br /> <br />Mr. Weber asked if there are any neighborhood groups or block captains as that could be another <br />group of stakeholders. <br /> <br />The Community Development Director noted that she could look into that further related to <br />National Night Out. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.