Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />PLANNING REPORT <br />T0: <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />RE: <br />File No: <br />BACKGROUND <br />Little Canada Mayor and City Counci~i <br />Little Canatla Planning Commission <br />James Vick <br />31 July 1984 <br />R & S Automotive - Conditional Use Permit <br />758.09 - 84.21 <br />In 1982, when R & S Automotive last proposed to expand their business, there <br />was considerable debate over traffic circulation 'in the area. The south par- <br />cel which they planned to build on was land-locked, the road easement dedi- <br />cated to serve the parcel was not feasible, and an alternative route could <br />not be worked out. After four months of 1i tigation, R & S withdrew their <br />application. <br />While no construction has occurred on the R & S property since that time, <br />the business has expanded by increasing their storage of varecked automobiles <br />onto their property to the south. An automotive junk yard is allowed as a <br />conditional use in the I-1 District, but unrestrained, this expansion has <br />resulted in a host of 0~°dinance violations. <br />At the 27 June City Council meeting, R & S presented an application for a <br />conditional use permit_to bring their operation into conformance with City <br />Coae. Again, traffic circulation became an issue, and due to conflicting <br />interests on the road easement, the issue was-tabled far evaluation by the <br />City Attorney. The Attorney has determined that the road easement is not <br />valid since it was never properly recorded. Ode must now evaluate the alter- <br />natives. <br />ISSUES AND ANALYSIS <br />Circulation Alternatives. As demonstrated in the minutes from City Council <br />meetings of July, August and September of 1982, an alternative i°oad for cir- <br />culation is not feasible. In a meeting with the applicant, we have suggested <br />that a71 three parcels owned by R & S be combined to eliir~inate the possibility <br />of the southern parcel from becoming an independent business and thereby eli- <br />minating the need of a road. This parcel is under contraci for deed, however, <br />and Ramsey County vain not allow it to be combined under these conditions. <br />4820 minnetonka boulevard, suite 420 minr;eapolis, mn 554-16 612/925-9420 <br />