Laserfiche WebLink
<br />• Allen Avenue – Allen Avenue was rehabilitated in 2020 and had $66,500 of storm sewer costs. <br />If those costs were assessable an additional $300 would have been added to each assessment, <br />raising them from $2400 to $2700. <br />• Greenbrier Circle – Greenbrier Circle is a full reconstruction project but it does not have very <br />much storm sewer work involved so staff ran the numbers as if it were a rehabilitation project. <br />There is approximately $12,000 of storm sewer work proposed for Greenbrier Circle. If half of <br />that were assessed it would add $400 to each assessment, which is similar to the Allen Avenue <br />example. <br />• Old County Road C – Old County Road C has more storm sewer costs and fewer properties being <br />assessed so the additional amount that would be assessed is $884 per property. That is a more <br />significant number. <br />Staff is seeking direction from the City Council regarding adding storm sewer costs as assessable costs. <br />The Remaining Seven Streets to be Reconstructed: There are seven streets remaining that need to be <br />fully reconstructed to an urban standard with curb and gutter. Most of these are short, relatively low <br />populated residential streets but there is one fully commercial street with numerous challenges and one <br />additional street that has commercial property abutting it. The Council indicated including language in <br />the updated policy to keep those seven streets on the old policy, which means the capped rate will be <br />calculated using the Consumer Price Index and storm sewer costs will not be assessable (though they <br />likely wouldn’t be included anyway due to the cap). There is a chance there won’t be much difference <br />between the two rates but if one or more of the streets are not reconstructed within the next ten years <br />there may end up being a significant gap between the two indexes. Therefore, staff has added language <br />to the policy that keeps six of the streets on the current policy. The remaining street, Woodlynn Avenue, <br />is a bigger challenge. <br />Woodlynn Avenue is a wholly commercial street with no curb and gutter east of the railroad tracks and <br />very little in the way of storm sewer. Most of the stormwater from the properties abutting Woodlynn <br />Avenue flows into the street and down the hill to one catch basin at the east end of the road. The catch <br />basin outlets further east onto the St. Paul Regional Water Services Right-of-Way. Major improvements <br />to the storm sewer system are going to be needed when the road is reconstructed to account for the water <br />that the abutting properties are contributing to the street. The current conditions do not meet MS4 <br />standards, and staff believes those properties should share in the cost of the improvements. If the Council <br />agrees, staff will exclude Woodlynn Avenue from the roads that will use the current policy and will <br />instead use the proposed new policy, which will assess adjacent properties at an 80/20 rate including <br />storm sewer costs. <br />The previous issues were the issues that arose from discussions between staff and the City Council at the <br />workshop. The following report is the original report from the workshop. <br /> <br /> <br />