Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(8) <br /> <br />INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT ON MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE <br /> <br /> <br />Honorable Mayor and <br /> Members of the City Council <br />City of Little Canada <br />Little Canada, Minnesota <br /> <br /> <br />We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of <br />America and the standards applicable to the financial audits contained in Government Auditing <br />Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the <br />governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining <br />fund information of the City of Little Canada (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020, <br />and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial <br />statements, and have issued our report thereon dated April 28, 2021. <br /> <br />In connection with our audit, we noted that the City failed to comply with provisions of the General <br />Provisions for Claims and Disbursements of Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities, <br />promulgated by the State Auditor pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 6.65, in so far as they relate to accounting <br />matters as described in the Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs as items 2020-001. Also, in <br />connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the City failed to <br />comply with the provisions of the contracting and bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of <br />interest, public indebtedness, claims and disbursements, miscellaneous provisions, and tax increment <br />financing sections of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities, promulgated by the State <br />Auditor pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 6.65, insofar as they relate to accounting matters,. However, our audit <br />was not directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance. Accordingly, had we <br />performed additional procedures, other matters may have come to our attention regarding the City's <br />noncompliance with the above-referenced provisions, insofar as they relate to accounting matters. <br /> <br />The City’s written response to the legal compliance finding identified in our audit is described in the <br />Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs. The City’s response was not subjected to the auditing <br />procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and, accordingly, we express no opinion on <br />it. <br /> <br />The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of compliance relating to the <br />provisions of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities and the results of that testing, and <br />not to provide an opinion on compliance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose. <br /> <br /> CliftonLarsonAllen LLP <br />Minneapolis, Minnesota <br />April 28, 2021 <br />