My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-09-2021 Workshop Packet
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
06-09-2021 Workshop Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2022 4:05:45 PM
Creation date
2/9/2022 3:25:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8.Changes to the industrial zoning districts <br />Does the Council accept the idea of consolidating the industrial districts? <br />Current Industrial <br />Zoning Districts <br />Proposed Industrial <br />Zoning Districts <br />I-1, Light Industry <br />I-1, Limited Industrial <br />B-I, Business / Industrial <br />B-W, Business / Warehouse <br />I-2, General Industrial <br />I-P, Industrial Park I-2, Industrial-Office Park <br />9.No minimum parking ratios for the commercial or industrial districts <br />Is the Council willing to trust the commercial and industrial development markets to provide <br />sufficient off-street parking for their own needs? <br />In the General Development Regulations chapter, it is proposed that there be no minimum <br />parking ratios for future commercial or industrial land uses. <br />Typical standards for commercial or industrial parking have often resulted in an excess number of <br />spaces used, inefficient land use, increased water run-off, excess reflected heat, increased <br />development costs, and reduced walkability. <br />As an alternative, the City would rely on the judgment of the private sector to build enough parking <br />for its intended use, knowing that on-street parking is not allowed along most major streets, that any <br />parking allowed on a public street may be revoked, and that very few if any businesses could survive <br />in this suburban location without auto parking. The developers’ site planners will likely fall back on <br />past standards or slightly less. Future owners or occupants of such buildings will judge for themselves <br />if there is enough parking for their use, considering other businesses that may have to share the <br />parking lot. <br />Alternatives include: (1) leaving the regulations as they are or (2) reducing the minimum ratios <br />somewhat.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.