My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-04-2021 Parks_Rec Minutes
>
Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
03-04-2021 Parks_Rec Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2022 4:20:55 PM
Creation date
2/9/2022 4:20:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PARKS & REC COMMISSION <br />MARCH 4, 2021 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />2 <br />environmentally friendly. She stated that bike racks encourage bicycling, create less clutter from <br />bikes laying around the park, and provide a sense of security and safety for bikers. She reviewed <br />different design options, along with potential costs. She stated that the group also reviewed <br />possible locations, noting that different parks could be phased in at different times dependent on <br />cost and budget. She reviewed the park prioritization tiers that the subcommittee developed <br />along with potential costs for the tiers based on the different design choices. She noted that the <br />cost estimates include the rack purchase, cement base, and installation cost. She reviewed the <br />timeline, noting that if the Commission supported this action they would present to the Council <br />in April, program this into the CIP in 2021, and installation could begin in spring of 2022. She <br />noted that the subcommittee also discussed the concept of a bike maintenance station and <br />identified some potential locations. <br /> <br />Commissioner Ray commented that he is pleased to see the costs as he thought the costs would <br />be higher. <br /> <br />Chair Miller asked if both options would be freestanding and whether one option would be better <br />than the other for those that just want to set their bikes and do not use locks. <br /> <br />Commissioner Abruzzese stated that the loop would be more stable for that purpose. <br /> <br />Commissioner Horwath commented that typically the hitch style is found on narrower sidewalks. <br />He commented that in the parks either option could be used but believed the loop would be a <br />better choice for stability and the ability to keep more bikes. <br /> <br />Chair Miller agreed that he also preferred the loop design with the Little Canada logo. <br /> <br />Commissioner Abruzzese stated that if there is a quick release back tire it would be more <br />difficult to secure the bike on the hitch style. <br /> <br />Commissioner Chu stated that she prefers the loop option as well as it would be more <br />aesthetically pleasing even when not in use. <br /> <br />Chair Miller commented that the group would not have to limit to one design, noting that if one <br />style fits into a location better, it could be chosen for that location. <br /> <br />Commissioner Ray commented that there is a premier bicycle shop in Little Canada and perhaps <br />they could approach that business for support. <br /> <br />Commissioner Chu commented that would be a great way to show community support. <br /> <br />Chair Miller noted that sponsorship opportunities could provide potential funding. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.