My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-01-2021 Parks & Rec Commission Minutes
>
Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
04-01-2021 Parks & Rec Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2022 4:20:55 PM
Creation date
2/9/2022 4:20:23 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PARKS & REC COMMISSION <br />APRIL 1, 2021 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />2 <br />Chair Miller commented that a few members of the Commission attended the joint meeting with <br />the Council and consultant to discuss and develop an RFP for Pioneer Park. He provided details <br />on the discussion that occurred and preferences for lighting, water feature, playground, and <br />multi-use facility. He stated that the biggest message he took away from the Council was that <br />they should continue to work forward at elements that could move forward sooner, such as <br />lighting, while still keeping the master plan in mind. <br /> <br />The Community Services Manager agreed that the consensus was to keep the momentum going <br />and not let the multi-use facility hold up progress. He displayed a timeline of the next steps, <br />noting that it is an aggressive timeline. <br /> <br />Commissioner Ray stated that he liked the discussion related to the center building and making <br />that second floor usable with picnic tables and an open concept on the main level. <br /> <br />Commissioner Abruzzese asked for input on the water feature and the context, noting that the <br />minutes state “small”. <br /> <br />Chair Miller provided additional context stating that the purpose is to have something smaller for <br />the children but not large enough where it would draw in too many visitors or cause too much <br />noise. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hipp agreed that it seemed the consensus was to have a natural type water feature <br />that children could run through. She commented that the lighting on the path seemed to be a <br />priority. She noted that she has received comments that the path is not wide enough and asked if <br />that could be improved or whether a secondary path could be added for bikers and others to use <br />that would alleviate some of the traffic from that path. <br /> <br />Commissioner Chu asked how the information from the studies that were completed was <br />incorporated into the discussion and plans. <br /> <br />The Community Services Manager commented that feedback has guided this process and will be <br />included in the RFP as well. <br /> <br />Commissioner Schletty referenced the community input period included in the timeline and <br />asked for details on what that would involve. <br /> <br />The Community Services Manager commented that they were able to get the contact information <br />for those that participated in the previous round of community engagement and therefore it <br />should be easy to reach out to those residents to gain additional input. <br /> <br />Commissioner Chu commented that community events would be another opportunity to gather <br />input from the community. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.