My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-03-2021 Parks & Rec Commission Minutes
>
Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
06-03-2021 Parks & Rec Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2022 4:20:55 PM
Creation date
2/9/2022 4:20:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PARKS & REC COMMISSION <br />JUNE 3, 2021 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />3 <br />future expansion. She reviewed the two proposed concepts for the play node, identifying <br />locations for the different play node elements within each concept. She then provided more <br />details on the playground which would focus on accessibility, would include rope elements and <br />elements with height, while also incorporating a unique theme. She provided different <br />photographic examples along with general projected costs for different play equipment options. <br /> <br />Mr. Shields asked the Commission for input on whether there are elements that were reviewed <br />that would help to make the playground a success. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hipp asked if there is a theme that could connect to the history of Little Canada, <br />which should be something different than the playground at Spooner to provide more options. <br />She stated that she liked the example of the ropes course and large slide and then a water feature <br />that looks natural such as a rock waterfall. <br /> <br />Chair Miller agreed that the theme would help to provide direction. He confirmed that ropes and <br />climbing was a reoccurring theme from the public. <br /> <br />Commissioner Abruzzese stated that one of the features provided an integrated theme leading <br />into the water feature and she prefers the shade feature and landscaping to also be cohesive to the <br />theme. <br /> <br />Commissioner Ray commented that he would tend to favor concept two as that would place the <br />water feature more in the center of where people would come in. <br /> <br />Commissioner Chu stated that she has been visiting many parks recently and a new park in <br />Winona stood out to her. She stated that the idea of climbing and height has become popular and <br />noted an example she has seen of a climbing wall. She referenced Tamarack Nature Center <br />which has a unique theme that allows for climbing. <br /> <br />Commissioner Horwath stated that the park also includes a sign that encourages parents to let <br />their kids be creative and explore the play features. He stated that he also prefers concept two. <br /> <br />Commissioner Chu asked if congestion would be created by having the playground and water <br />feature so close to the entrance. <br /> <br />Mr. Shields stated that people will gravitate toward the features in the park they want to use, <br />whether that is the play node or fields. He stated that the sidewalk trail is also an important <br />feature. <br /> <br />Ms. Dahlheimer explained that the play node is meant to group those play features while the <br />other users of the park can stay on the main trail to reach the fields or other uses in the park. <br /> <br />Commissioner Chu provided the name of the park she has mentioned earlier with climbing.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.