Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />FEBRUARY 9, 2022 <br />3 <br />MnDOT how we will spend the funds by February 28, 2022, and staff feels the best use is to apply <br />them to the 2022 street improvement projects as this will help with the City’s portion of the cost. <br />McGraw introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2022-2-24 – ACCEPT AND DESIGNATE $36,618 RECEIVED FROM <br />THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE AID <br />CORONAVIRUS RESPONSE AND RELIEF SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS ACT <br />TO THE 2022 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Miller. <br />Ayes (5). Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />APPROVE PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZE ADVERTISING FOR BIDS <br />FOR RONDEAU PARK IMPROVEMENTS <br />The Parks & Rec/Community Services Director stated that staff has planned an improvement project <br />for Rondeau Park in 2022 using funds the City received from the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA). <br />He explained that some of the work is being contracted directly by staff, and other work has been put <br />together into a package that will be bid publicly. He stated these items include new sidewalks and <br />trails throughout the park, drainage improvements near the basketball courts, grading and drainage <br />needed for the new shade and play structures and tree and landscaping plantings. He stated the overall <br />project budget is $520,000 with the site improvements in the bid package estimated at $130,000 of the <br />budget. <br />McGraw introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2022-2-25 – APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR <br />DESIGNATED IMPROVEMENTS AND ORDER ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR <br />2022 RONDEAU PARK IMPROVEMENTS NO. 2022-07 <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Torkelson. <br />Ayes (5). Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />CITY COUNCIL CODE OF CONDUCT <br />The City Clerk stated that in November when Council was reviewing the updated Personnel Policy, <br />Councilmember McGraw stated that he would the Council to adopt a Code of Conduct in order to <br />provide expectations of behavior for current and future City Council members. She reported that staff <br />has drafted a policy for the Council to consider. She explained the Introduction paragraph at the <br />beginning of the policy could be used as this pledge and be made into a separate document that is <br />signed by Council members, either along with the Oath of Office, or even annually. <br />Torkelson stated that he thinks it is a good document, but he would like a little more time to go over <br />his suggestions. Keis stated that his only comment is that there are no consequences, but he does not <br />know what those could be. Fischer stated that he feels the document could be very general and short. <br />McGraw stated he thinks it was good, had a couple sections that he thinks could be simplified, and