My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-23-2022 Council Packet
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2022
>
03-23-2022 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2022 1:25:51 PM
Creation date
3/29/2022 1:24:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Public Hearing: <br />A Variance requires a Public Hearing and the City Council will need to open the hearing at their <br />March 23, 2022 meeting to take comment from the public. At that time, they will consider the <br />comments from the public and the Variance application after the hearing has been closed. A public <br />notice has been published in the newspaper and the property owners within 350 feet of the site <br />have been notified of the proceedings. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDED ACTION <br /> <br />To consider approval of a Variance application to allow a reduction in a side yard setback from <br />20’-0” to 8’-0” to accommodate a new building addition, located at 209 Ryan Drive, PID <br />313022340011, with the following findings: <br />1. The property is found to be of unique circumstance because of the challenging soils, high <br />ground water, and the development configuration is the best and highest use of the site to <br />be able to construct the addition. <br />2. City staff does not find this proposal to be detrimental to the public health, welfare, or <br />injurious to other property in the territory in which the property is situated. <br />3. The physical factors of the property are the main reason for the variance request in that it <br />produces an extreme hardship that is limited to the topography and wetland located on the <br />site. In addition, under Minnesota law, we find that practical difficulty has been <br />met, meaning (1) the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner <br />permitted by the ordinance, (2) the owner's plight is due to circumstances unique to the <br />property not created by the property owner. <br />4. The request for variance is not based on an economic hardship and solely based on the <br />physical aspects of the site and is the best and highest use of the property. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.