My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-24-08 Council Workshop Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
11-24-08 Council Workshop Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2009 2:45:27 PM
Creation date
12/3/2008 8:41:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />NOVEMBER 24, 2008 <br />Star Program in those communities. The Administrator was not sure, but <br />thought they routinely included in the Crime-Free-Drug-Free Lease <br />Addendums. <br />The Administrator indicated that Little Canada has 1,488 multi-family <br />units plus rental single-family, townhouses, four-plexes, and condos. He <br />estimated a total of 1,600 to 1,700 rental units. The Administrator noted <br />that contract inspections will take far less time for the City, however, there <br />will still be a lot of coordination and follow-up required by the City. <br />McGraw suggested that the Administrator put together an estimate of City <br />staff time on a per unit basis. He indicated that the per unit license fee <br />should cover this time so that the cost of the program does not fall back on <br />the taxpayer. The Administrator indicated that he would contact the City <br />of South St. Paul to determine if they have any cost estimates. Allan <br />asked what the City staff would be required to do to administer the <br />program. The Administrator felt most of the work would be clerical-based <br />in organizing and moving data around. There will be some oversight <br />needed for this program, and the Administrator felt that he, the Fire <br />Marshal, Building Official, and Code Enforcement Officer would all have <br />involvement. <br />With regard to the cost of unit inspection fees, the City Adminisriā¢ator <br />reported that he discussed potential fees with an inspection firm. Based on <br />the type of housing and number of units, this firm has several pricing <br />sriuctures and discounts. The Administrator provided a listing of the <br />many firms that do these types of inspections. The Administrator reported <br />that in order to obtain a license the City of South St. Paul requires that <br />inspectors be certified by either the Cities of St. Paul or Minneapolis, each <br />of which have educational requirements. <br />The Administrator reported that he asked about timelines for getting unit <br />inspections done based on the fact that the licenses will be annual. It was <br />thought that a July lst through June 30th license period may help ensure <br />that all inspections are done prior to issuance of the licenses and would <br />improve the availability of inspectors. <br />The Administrator then began a review of the proposed ordinance, and <br />noted one provision that would require the property manager to reside in <br />the seven county metropolitan area. The Council felt the requirement was <br />not necessary. <br />Keis asked about the references to business entity given there was no <br />definition of this term in the ordinance. The City Attorney reported that <br />there is a legal definition of business entity and felt the reference was <br />appropriate. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.