My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-24-2022 Workshop Packet
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2022
>
08-24-2022 Workshop Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2022 7:58:52 PM
Creation date
9/21/2022 7:53:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
like California’s Proposition 13 that hobble the revenue base well below <br />the inflation rate, one approach is what some California pension systems <br />have adopted: the Supplemental Targeted Adjustment for Retirees, <br />acronymized as the “STAR COLA.” Pension adjustments are capped at a <br />fixed annual level, and future “make-up” payments — STAR COLAs — are <br />provided if inflation subsides. In 2023, this means that these retirees will <br />not receive an increase of more than 2 or 3 percent, depending on labor <br />agreements, with the remainder of any CPI adjustment payable in future <br />years if and when the inflation rate is lower than the STAR COLA’s <br />predetermined hurdle rate. <br /> <br />Besides employers’ revenue constraints, part of the rationale for STAR <br />COLAs is that retirees face lower inflation pain than active employees, <br />having presumably stabilized their housing costs, so they are better able <br />to accept a delay in COLA payments as long as they can eventually catch <br />up. This arrangement also helps the pension actuaries make realistic <br />forecasts of future pension cost inflation (now about 2.6 percent <br />nationally) because the cap is there, and they can model in the <br />accumulation of “STAR reserve” payments that will eventually work their <br />way into the retiree liability calculation. <br /> <br />Although this formulation may seem odd to policymakers in other states, <br />it’s actually a fairly sensible solution to a complex problem that ought to <br />be considered for pensions elsewhere — and perhaps also for salary <br />adjustments where the employer’s revenues are constrained or volatile. <br /> <br />Outlook: My crystal ball still sees inflation rates in 2023 registering <br />above 4 or even 5 percent early in the year and above 3 percent for most <br />of the rest, but nothing like the 8 to 9 percent year-over-year CPI <br />increases we have seen lately. The most likely path of “sticky <br />disinflation” will be a gradual downward stair step pattern of <br />successively lower CPI reports as the Fed tries to thread the needle to <br />bring the economy to a soft landing without delivering a hard recession. <br />Having a game plan for both possible outcomes is a really smart strategy.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.