My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-26-2022 Council Packet
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2022
>
10-26-2022 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2022 5:09:22 PM
Creation date
11/1/2022 5:02:15 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
181
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Sign Number Approximate Location Traffic Counts Sign Size Estimated Cost Priority Existing Sign Notes1 Rice/I694 ~15k Large 25 -50K High None.Location TBD. Prioritize N/S traffic. City would prefer island placement, but the county has not provided consent for that. Many practical locations technically fall in Vadnais Heights. If an alternate location is used the sign may need to be donwsized to medium or small.2 South Owasso/Rice ~3k DoT / ~10k PDoT Small 2.5-5K Low Existing on East Bound South OwassoPotential to coordinate with future A&W development?3 LC Rd/Rice ~5k DoT / 11k PDoT Small 2.5-5K Low Existing Obelisk on each side. Could existing Obelisk be enhanced?4 County C/Rice ~6k DoT / 12k PDoT Medium 5-25K MediumExisting Sign on Eastbound County C. Removed due to RCU ConstructionExisting sign may be adequate (if in good condition) until intersection reconfiguration occurs. Coordinate with RCU Development and County on future Rice Redevelopment. If possible, move sign closer to intersection as the near driveway will be eliminated.5 County B2/Rice 6k DoT / 14k PDoT Large 25 -50K Medium None.Plenty of space on right of way next to retaining wall.6 Rice/MN36 25k DoT / 5k PDoT Large 25 -50K High None.Placement TBD: Align N/S of 36? Coordinate with BRT expansion? Prefer North of 36 because higher traffic volumes from 36 offramps. Sidenote: Can we work with MetroTransit to rename the stations? Can we name the Park & Ride the Little Canada Park & Ride, then rename the Little Canada Transit Station to Marketplace Transit Station? Possibly build new shelter. 7 LC Rd/County C 13k DoT / Medium 5-25K Medium Existing Obelisk on each side of LC Rd.Prefer placement in middle of roundabout. Enhance existing obelisk?8 LC Rd/I35E~13k LC Rd / ~122k HighwayXtra Large 75-125K High None.Bridge placement to brand highway crossing. Road Signs may obscure visibility on Bridge itself. Can placement occur between off-ramp and Highway on both sides?9 Edgerton/County D ~5k Medium 5-25K Medium Existing Sign Southbound Edgerton.Vadnais Heights sign makes LC look a little lacklustre. 10 Edgerton/MN36 ~6k Medium 5-25K Medium Existing Sign Northbound Edgerton.Plenty of space available in RoW, may need MNDOT approval.11 Keller/Arcade ~1k DoT / ~1k PDoT Small 2.5-5K Medium Existing Sign on NW corner.Easy to replace existing sign. Sign currently in bad condition which merits high replacement priority.12 Arcade/MN36 ~1k DoT Small 2.5-5K Low None.Placement TBD. Joint entry to LC and Maplewood makes placement tricky. 13 Labore/County D ~4k DoT / ~2k PDoT Small 2.5-5K Medium Existing Sign on Southbound EdgertonCan an angled corner sign serve traffic going West and South? Power lines interfere with optimal placement. Great space on the Southeast corner, but that would not ideally serve traffic entering Litle Canada through County D from Maplewood.14 Linear Park Westwind Trail Pedestrian Trail Small 2.5-5K Low None.Easy to add, serves pedestrian traffic entering from inter-city trail system.15 Twin Lake Trail ~1k Small 2.5-5K Low Existing Sign on Eastbount Twin Lake TrailExisting sign may be adeqaute if in good condition.Small Sign Range 17,500 ‐ 35KMedium Sign Range 20K ‐ 100KLarge Sign Range 75K ‐ 150KXL Sign Range 75K ‐ 125K Total 302,500-685K
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.