Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />OCTOBER 26, 2022 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />7 <br />shelter, picnic tables, benches, drinking fountain and entry kiosk, and noted the park amenities are being <br />procured directly by the City in order to reduce markup and capitalize on any end-of-year sales. He stated <br />the remaining items such as grading, sidewalks, fencing and landscaping have been bundled into a site <br />improvements project that will be publicly bid late this fall. <br /> <br />The Parks & Rec/Community Services Director stated the funding for this project is coming from $576,000 <br />from City’s American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding, $196,000 from Fund 400, a $300,000 Minnesota <br />Department of Natural Resources grant, and a $400,000 donation from the Little Canada Recreation <br />Association. He noted he is still looking for additional donations and grants. <br /> <br />Torkelson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2022-10-118 –APPROVE THE PIONEER PARK PLANS & <br />SPECIFICATIONS AS PRESENTED AND AUTHORIZE ADVERTISING FOR BIDS <br /> <br />The foregoing amended resolution was duly seconded by Miller. <br /> Ayes (5). Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br /> <br />GATEWAY SIGNAGE COMMITTEE REPORT <br />The Community Development Director stated that “Enhancing Identity and Empowering Community” <br />was one of the four strategic directions included in the City’s 2019 Strategic Plan. She reported that <br />one of the strategic initiatives related to this direction was to consider updating the gateway signs that <br />are located in multiple entry points to the City to enhance the community’s identity. She explained <br />that a task force of representatives from various boards and commissions have been meeting over the <br />last six months to consider options and discuss recommendations for improvements to the City’s <br />existing ‘Welcome to Historic Little Canada’ signs. She stated that the task force also discussed the <br />current locations of signs and if additional locations should be considered. She reviewed the list of <br />findings the committee recommended, and stated this could be a 10-year long project. <br /> <br />Fischer stated the staff report included information on what the signs should not say, but asked if there <br />was some guidance from the committee on what the signs might say. The Community Development <br />Director stated they want to keep it simple. Torkelson noted that the new trend for cities is now signs <br />that simply say the city name, and maybe also a logo. Fischer suggested making monument signs be a <br />style that is harder to vandalize, noting the missing letters from the Vadnais Heights sign. Torkelson <br />stated there was an effort by the committee to mark areas where the signs could go. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued about the estimated costs and design styles. The City Administrator reminded the <br />City Council that none of the funds for signs are included in the capital improvement fund, and these <br />alone could drain that fund. Torkelson noted that the committee recognizes that these signs would be <br />nice to have, and maybe funds can be determined at a later date. Keis asked if the trails are all marked. <br />The Parks & Rec/Community Services Director noted that he is working on three different park related <br />sign projects right now. <br />