Laserfiche WebLink
7)Researching technology, software, etc. <br />Several staff commented on the challenges associated with finding time to review, <br />research and decide upon new technologies to implement at City Hall and then having <br />to determine a reliable vendor to go with. The recommendation to hire a Community <br />Engagement Director is intended to help the City to be more proactive in obtaining the <br />technology needed to realize greater efficiencies. <br />I am also recommending that staff continue to be encouraged to attend professional <br />meetings, network with staff from other cities, attend training through the League of <br />MN Cities and participate in conferences where frequently there are vendors <br />highlighting new products and various sessions focused on local government issues. <br />Staff may not have had time for this previously but hopefully as more technology is <br />introduced and additional staff are available to assist the workload will allow for more <br />networking and training. The City has to do its own research into products and software <br />and technologies available, but a lot can be learned from having connections with other <br />cities and talking directly with other city staff about what they are currently using to <br />streamline city operations. <br />8)Performance Reviews <br />The City has a three page employee performance review to evaluate employees, <br />supervisors and department heads in nine performance areas and concludes with <br />employee work, training and educational goals. The employee being evaluated can <br />provides comments before signing. I would recommend adding a section that <br />specifically encourages employees and supervisors to provide feedback to the <br />supervisor co pletin the evaluation. This ay e ana e ent’s e pectatio n and <br />understanding in providing the employee comments section, but it could be more <br />specifically requested with a few basic questions. <br />A staff person noted that there were several years when performance evaluations were <br />not completed and that performance evaluations are, based on their understanding, an <br />annual requirement. Supervisors that fail to complete performance reviews should <br />have this documented in their performance appraisal and be eligible for wage increases <br />until performance evaluations are completed if that is the City policy. Staff appreciate <br />the documented evaluation. Frequently, I see a more extensive performance review for <br />supervisory and department head positions which are held to a higher level of <br />expectation then line employees. <br />9)Job descriptions <br />Job descriptions are well written and up to date for the most part, I would recommend <br />updating several job descriptions that have not been reviewed in recent years. These <br />job descriptions include the Building Official, Emergency Management and Public Works <br />Director. These positions were last reviewed in 2002, 2000 and 2001 respectively. <br />28 of 63