Laserfiche WebLink
Becklin & Whitney <br />Consulting Engineers, Inc. <br />1628 CourrrY HwY.10, S[mrE 17 <br />SPxuvc I,nxs•, Pnxx, MN <br />PaoNE (763) 689-5631 Fnx (763) 552-5631 <br />March 13, 2009 <br />Canabury Square Condominium Association <br />1420 Demont Ave. <br />Little Canada, MN <br />RE: Performing work from Interior or <br />Leaving things as they aze <br />To Whom It May Concern: <br />There has been discussion about an alternative approach to our proposed scope of work. The <br />proposed procedure is to remove the exterior cladding of the building and do the work from the <br />exterior of the building. <br />An alternative approach has been proposed to do the work from the "Interior". I asked Donlaz <br />Construction, the proposed contractor and Pella W indows, approved window manufacturer, to weigh <br />in on this approach. In their attached letters, they have both covered this very well. <br />I feel the bottom line is that, if work is done from interior, we can not solve all the problems with the <br />exterior walls ofthe building. The fundamental problems with lack of drainage plain would remain. <br />Replacing windows in existing openings would not solve window flashing problems. If stucco was <br />cut out 8 to 12" azound windows, then windows could be flashed properly. Of course you would <br />need to patch the stucco azound every window. <br />ff work was done from the interior, we could repair all rotted wood members and we could also treat <br />any mold present and after cutting out around windows we could get windows to drain properly. We <br />could remove wet or deteriorated exterior fiberboazd sheathing between studs, but it would need to <br />remain in front of studs. The deterioration and mold would be gone on the day work for that area <br />is completed. But, because ofthe existing conshuction,deterioration and mold could reoccur at any <br />time. <br />