Laserfiche WebLink
WORKSHOP MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JULY 12, 2023 <br />The City Administrator explained that franchise fees have provided an essential source of revenues <br />for the Capital Infrastructure Fund 450, and these fees have exclusively been used to fund street <br />infrastructure capital projects. He noted that other sources of revenue for Fund 450 are approximately <br />$400,000 per year of Municipal State Aid (MSA) funds and approximately $160,000 of General <br />Property Tax Levy each year. He noted that other revenues are mostly one-time contributions to the <br />fund, such as grants, or special assessment revenues which are the residents share of a street <br />improvement project. He explained that the current proposed 2024-2033 ten-year Capital <br />Improvement Plan (CIP) expects an estimated deficit of $3,502,607. <br />The City Administrator stated that the recommendation is not to reduce the funding since that <br />would eliminate a funding source, but noted that Little Canada is charging about half the amount <br />that most other cities currently are. He stated that adding a gas franchise fee is also being <br />considered. He explained that anytime the City wants to change the amount of the franchise <br />fees, the agreement with Xcel Energy needs to be opened up and that is a big process. <br />Fischer stated that the Council seems to be in agreement with keeping the electrical franchise fee <br />and increasing it, but that adding the new gas franchise fee could be more difficult. The City <br />Administrator reviewed what other cities have for gas franchise fees, and noted that most have <br />both electric and gas franchise fees. The Finance Director explained that these fees would <br />continue to pay for improvement projects. He noted that the costs for these improvements are <br />increasing, but the revenues to pay for these is not keeping up so there will be deficits in the fund <br />soon. The City Administrator explained that if more franchise fees are collected, then some <br />money that currently goes towards improvements could be directed to the General Fund instead <br />to help cover increasing policing and staff costs. <br />Kwapick suggested making the electric fee higher and not adding the gas fee. T. Miller stated <br />that she feels the fees should be separate in order to be more transparent for residents to <br />understand that there are two fees instead of having one higher fee, even though they both go to <br />the same place. She noted that people may compare the fee amount to another city's amount and <br />not realize that Little Canada only charges one fee. The City Administrator stated that staff will <br />bring this back to Council in the near future. <br />PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF PROPOSED STORMWATER UTILITY FEE <br />The City Administrator stated that staff has been talking about adding a stormwater fee for the <br />last few years in order to help fund the stormwater maintenance costs that the City is currently <br />paying for. The City Engineer stated that an overwhelming majority of cities in the metro area <br />have stormwater fees in order to support the water utility systems. He explained that the City <br />owns and maintains a growing network of stormwater infrastructure such as rain gardens, <br />manholes and catch basins, culvers, ditches, conveyance piping, infiltration & filtration basins <br />and constructed stormwater ponds. He stated that the increased revenue can help with flood <br />mitigation and water quality improvements. He noted that stormwater requirements are <br />continually getting more restrictive and cities have to do more to fulfill permit requirements. He <br />stated that funding currently only comes from Franchise Fees and property taxes. He stated that <br />stormwater improvements or repairs done during street improvement projects are paid only by <br />the city, not through assessments. <br />`a <br />