Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />AUGUST 10, 2023 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />4 <br />Chair Johnson asked the input desired at this time. <br /> <br />The Community Development Director replied that they would want input on whether keeping <br />of chickens would be a good idea as well as input on the different parameters mentioned in the <br />presentation. <br /> <br />Chair Johnson welcomed input from the members of the public in attendance. <br /> <br />Leanne Love, 555 Little Canada Road, commented that she and her husband are very pro <br />chicken, and this is the only city they looking at that does not allow chickens. She commented <br />that chickens are great for soil health, promote sustainable living, lower your carbon footprint, <br />are great for children, and are great for the community. She noted that people with chickens <br />often share eggs with their neighbors. She commented that when living in Minneapolis, she was <br />not even aware her neighbor kept chickens. She did not agree that the entire backyard should be <br />fenced as that could be wasteful and prohibitively expensive. She agreed that the coop and run <br />should be fenced and/or covered, with enough space to promote healthy living for the chickens. <br />She did not believe neighbor approval should be required, noting that approval is not required for <br />dogs and dogs can be much more disruptive. She did not agree that the coop should be <br />considered an accessory structure as someone would need to choose between a coop and shed, <br />when supplies are often stored in a shed. She would like to see six chickens allowed. She <br />commented that chickens are fun, quirky and entertaining to have around. <br /> <br />Hellen Martin, 193 Burke Lane, agreed with the comments of the previous speaker. She stated <br />that Little Canada is late to the party on this topic and seems to have chosen the most restrictive <br />aspects from neighboring communities. She commented that her neighbors have four dogs, and <br />they did not have any input on that, noting that she trusted that the City has ordinances in place <br />to regulate that activity and it should be the same for chickens. She also supported allowing six <br />chickens, or more depending on the lot size. She strongly disagreed with the neighbor approval <br />as a neighbor should not have control over what is done on her property, as there are regulations <br />in place to ensure there are not issues. She commented that if a neighbor were to deny the <br />request of another neighbor, that could also create conflict that did not previously exist. She <br />commented that the run and coop should be fenced with proper fencing to provide protection <br />from predators, noting that typical fencing does not provide that protection and therefore fencing <br />the entire yard would not provide the desired benefit. She thanked the City for doing this <br />research and being open to this concept. She commented that she does have a shed on her <br />property and was told she did not need a permit because it was under a certain size. She <br />commented that if someone could have a shed of that size along with a coop, she did not think <br />that would create issues for people as they would have ample room to store supplies. She asked <br />why this is titled “backyard chickens”. She noted that she has a reverse pie shaped yard, <br />therefore they do not really have a backyard and would need to place their chickens in the front <br />with the proper screening. <br />