My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-10-2023 Planning Commission Minutes
>
Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
08-10-2023 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2023 3:49:44 PM
Creation date
8/25/2023 3:49:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />AUGUST 10, 2023 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />6 <br />to generate this type of discussion and they will build from here. He stated that all the comments <br />tonight are focused on chickens exclusively whereas the ordinance contains fowl, noting that <br />other types of fowl could generate other issues. <br /> <br />Ms. Simon replied that her friend has chickens and ducks and ducks are much messier. She <br />suggested that they limit to only chickens as most people desire those for egg production. <br /> <br />Chair Johnson stated that perhaps that is a recommendation from this conversation, that they <br />begin with just chickens at this time and if there is a desire to open to more types of fowl, they <br />could consider that in the future. <br /> <br />Commissioner Masrud commented that he agrees with the comments of the residents. He <br />referenced the Roseville situation which does not have any regulation and noted that he has not <br />heard about any issues that have resulted from that and therefore would support the absolute <br />minimum requirements. He commented that chickens are easy animals and did not believe <br />neighbor consent should be required. He did not believe there should be an application fee if an <br />application is even required. He commented that a setback of 20 feet seems very far into <br />someone’s yard and believed that five feet would be more reasonable. He stated that the <br />restrictions related to animal welfare seem to make more sense. He also agreed that roosters <br />should not be allowed. He stated that slaughtering could go either way and there are fishers and <br />hunters that kill animals in the city all the time. He believed that this level of restriction would <br />continue to keep the City behind the times. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lum referenced the neighbor consent and asked if 80 percent would mean that 80 <br />percent of your neighbors would have to agree to you having chickens. <br /> <br />Mr. Riemer provided additional details on that concept, stating that if there are four surrounding <br />neighbors, three or more would need to approve. He stated that the proposed ordinance was <br />based on the best practices of the other cities they reviewed, and nothing is set in stone, they are <br />simply gathering input before drafting an ordinance to consider. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lum stated that she is not familiar with chickens and asked some problems that <br />would require neighbor consent. She stated that there are a lot of dogs that live on her cul-de- <br />sac, and they cause a lot of noise. <br /> <br />Mr. Riemer commented that based off the research, the other cities did not comment on why that <br />was required in the code. He acknowledged that it would be a setback from someone getting <br />their application approved and perhaps some cities are using that to deter people from keeping <br />chickens. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kulousek asked if staff checked with White Bear Lake or Vadnais Heights, as <br />those communities allow chickens. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.