My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-10-2023 Planning Commission Minutes
>
Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
08-10-2023 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2023 3:49:44 PM
Creation date
8/25/2023 3:49:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />AUGUST 10, 2023 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />9 <br />Chair Johnson commented that if the question is do you agree with a 20-foot setback for a coup, <br />that is not setup to be neutral and would be concerned with the guiding that would be done <br />through that format. She commented that it would make the person think that is the proposed <br />regulation. She believed that there were other ways to ask those questions to gain better answers <br />and responses. She noted that people often do not choose to enter additional information and if <br />they are unsure as to how to answer the question, they will sometimes stop taking the survey. <br /> <br />The Community Development Director commented that they can modify the survey to perhaps <br />include ranges for certain items, such as the number of chickens and setback. <br /> <br />Commissioner Boe commented that they could use multiple choice to identify different ranges <br />and also have an “other” option that would allow the person to enter in an additional answer. <br /> <br />Chair Johnson moved to the topic of neighbor consent. She agreed with the comments that could <br />create ire between neighbors. She noted that approval is not required for someone to get a dog <br />and they arguably create a larger nuisance in terms of waste and noise. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kulousek stated that the City used to allow the keeping of chickens and asked if <br />the reason was known as to why that was stopped. <br /> <br />Chair Johnson commented that perhaps that was due to concern for predators. She had <br />questions about whether or not the coops need to be heated or are self-heating, as she would not <br />want to see a fire generated. <br /> <br />Ms. Simon commented that adult chickens will self-regulate in the coop. She stated that the only <br />time heat is needed is with baby chicks. She commented that baby chicks would not be outside <br />in the winter months and once they feather out, they would go out to the coop. She confirmed <br />that electricity would not be required for a coop. <br /> <br />Chair Johnson stated if there were an empty lot owned by a trust, it would be difficult to get <br />approval from that entity. She did not believe neighbor consent would be productive. <br /> <br />The Community Development Director noted that neighbors change over time, therefore that <br />approval would not seem to make sense. She noted that neighbor consent was previously <br />required for a variance and that has changed over time, therefore the concept of neighbor consent <br />may be outdated. <br /> <br />Chair Johnson asked for details on screening that would be required for the instance of the <br />resident with the unique shaped lot. She referenced the concept of butchering a chicken and <br />asked if a deer could be butchered in a garage. She stated that perhaps that is permitted within an <br />enclosed area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.