My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-13-09 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
05-13-09 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2009 11:28:57 AM
Creation date
5/8/2009 11:20:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />APRIL. 9, 2009 <br />Zirmer questioned the level of difficulty for inspectors to obtain City <br />licensing. The City Administrator indicated that if an inspector is licensed <br />in the Cities of Minneapolis or St. Paul, they will be eligible for a Little <br />Canada license. He noted that most of the inspectors have these licenses. <br />Z,inner asked if there will be a fee for the City's license. 'I he <br />Administrator indicated that he will have more specific details put together <br />at the time of ordinance adoption. <br />Oue property manager asked the about the tenant listing that is required <br />under the ordinance and how often the City wants that updated listing. <br />The Administrator indicated that management is required to maintain a up- <br />to-date tenant listing that would be available to the City an an as needed <br />basis. <br />One property owner asked about tenants that maliciously cause damage to <br />a unit and the impact of this on violations. The Administrator replied that <br />the City would work with property owners in those situations. <br />One property manager noted that some of their units just had Section 8 <br />inspections and asked if these inspections would suffice. The <br />Administrator replied that for the first cycle of inspections, independent <br />inspectors would be used. Once fhe City has information on property <br />conditions, it may be possible to substitute other inspections such as the <br />Section 8 inspections. <br />The next issues discussed related to license fees and ordinance <br />implementation date. The consensus of the Council was for a July 1, 2009 <br />implementation date delaying actual implementation until August 1'r given <br />the new carbon dioxide detector regulations. Property owners would have <br />four months to have inspections done and corrections made. The <br />Administrator noted that he has a draft of housing evaluator guidelines <br />that would be tttilized Uy the inspectors. Phis draft will be finalized and <br />an inspection checklist developed. That checklist will be sent to the <br />various property owners to they can do some proactive work on units prior <br />to inspections beginning. <br />'T'he length of tinge required for individual unit inspections was discussed, <br />and it was estimated that inspections will likely talcs about 10 minutes per <br />unit. <br />One property owner asked about inspection costs. The City Administrator <br />noted that the property ownership will be in a better position to negotiate <br />prices with contract inspectors. <br />The Council discussed that one goal is that all the rental housing units will <br />be well-maintained and that the City will be able to eliminate the <br />25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.