Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />OCTOBER 25, 2023 <br />noted that if a home is built to the minimum side yard setback, that would only leave two feet for the <br />chicken coop between the home and required five-foot setback, which would most likely discourage <br />most people from placing a coop in that location as it would need to be very close to the home. <br />Mayor Fischer referenced the language related to code enforcement and the ability to renew or deny an <br />application, while the Council would also have that authority and asked for more information. The <br />Community Development Director described the code enforcement process that is followed for any <br />license that has an issue develop. She stated that once escalated to a certain point, it would go forward <br />to the City Council to consider revocation of a license. She stated that if the minimum requirements <br />are not met, staff could refuse the application. <br />Mayor Fischer thanked staff for all the work that has been done on this ordinance and process. <br />Mayor Fischer commented that this has been a long time coming and those interested have provided a <br />lot of their time and effort during this process as well. He stated that while he believes that chickens <br />belong on a farm, backyard chickens in suburban communities have been a non -issue in the <br />communities that allow them. <br />Mayor Fischer introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOL UTION NO. 2023-10-124 —APPROVING ORDINANCE 881 AMENDING CITY <br />CODE CHAPTER 1103 TO ALLOW RAISING CHICKENS AND APPROVING A <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Gutierrez. <br />Ayes (5). Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />Labore Road Corridor Study Update <br />The Parks & Rec/Community Services Director stated that the intention is to present the final report <br />and hear about some potential funding opportunities. <br />The City Engineer provided background information on the Labore Road corridor study and the <br />engagement that was completed. He reviewed information on the technical analysis that was <br />completed and the additional public engagement that occurred. He reviewed the recommendations and <br />confirmed that any of the recommendations could be completed in standalone projects or could be <br />bundled together. He also provided information on City funding and potential sources of outside <br />funding. He asked the Council to accept the report and to consider providing guidance to staff to begin <br />programming funding and/or seeking outside funding for the recommended improvements. <br />Mayor Fischer commented that option two included a sidewalk while the other options showed a trail. <br />He asked the difference. The City Engineer replied that option two included a concrete sidewalk with <br />no changes to the road, while option four would shrink the road footprint and create a shared use path, <br />which would typically be asphalt. Mayor Fischer asked the cost difference between the two. The City <br />Engineer replied that concrete tends to be twice as much as asphalt, but the bulk of the cost would be <br />the road project. <br />3 <br />