Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />League of Minnesota Cities Human Resources Reference Manual 12/2/2022 <br />Benefits Chapter 5 | Page 6 <br />B.Employee recognition awards and employee <br />social events <br />LMC information memo, <br />Public Purpose <br />Expenditures. <br />MN Office of State Auditor: <br />Employee Recognition <br />Programs and Events. <br />Minn. Stat. § 15.46. <br />MN Office of State Auditor: <br />Statement of Position, <br />Employee Recognition <br />Programs and Events. <br />The League has historically taken the position cities can sponsor and pay <br />for employee recognition programs (including social events such as <br />employee picnics or holiday parties) if they are structured so they <br />constitute part of an overall employee compensation program. The <br />Attorney General has taken a narrow interpretation of the term <br />compensation and suggested the term means only monetary compensation. <br />In 2007, state law permitted cities to establish and operate a program of <br />preventive health and employee recognition services for its employees. <br />However, the Office of the State Auditor issued guidance in 2011 to the <br />City of Dayton that seems to question expenditures for employee picnics <br />or holiday parties. Cities wishing to provide employee recognition <br />programs should consider the following: <br />•Take formal action to adopt a program, preferably well in advance of <br />any actual expenditures, using language specifying the program is <br />adopted as additional compensation for work performed by the <br />employees. <br />•Develop a well-thought-out and modestly priced program applicable to <br />all employees who meet certain conditions. For example, “all <br />employees who reach 25 years of service will receive a plaque <br />thanking them for their dedicated years of service to the community.” <br />Or, “all regular full-time and regular part-time employees will be <br />invited to attend the city’s summer employee picnic to thank them for <br />their work throughout the year.” <br />Each city council should decide whether it believes these types of <br />employee benefits promote a public purpose and serve the best interests of <br />the citizens of their community. A good argument can be made that such <br />expenditures are a natural incident of the employer/employee relationship <br />and the authority for such expenditures is implied as part of the authority <br />to compensate employees. <br />IRS Publication 525. <br />With respect to taxability for various recognition awards, the IRS has <br />requirements for length of service awards. Among them, the awards <br />cannot be given prior to the employee’s fifth anniversary of employment <br />with the city. Also, the city may not award the employee another length of <br />service award during the year or the previous four years. An employee <br />achievement award must be an item of tangible personal property, and it <br />must be given to an employee for his/her length of service or for some <br />safety achievement. The circumstances surrounding the award must also <br />demonstrate the award is not likely to be disguised pay. <br />Attachment 4 - HRRM Benefits - Extract